User talk:Hezbollatte

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mark State (Toronto politician) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://mark-state.wetpaint.com/page/How+Toronto+Might+Improve+Its+Economic+Prospects+During+This+Downturn (matching the regex rule \bwetpaint\.com\b). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mark State (Toronto politician) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Netalarm  talk  05:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark State (Toronto politician)
A tag has been placed on Mark State (Toronto politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:29, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have declined this speedy deletion nomination, but have put the article up at "articles for deletion". Please feel free to comment at Articles for deletion/Mark State (Toronto politician). Kind regards, — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  07:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Blanking the AfD not permitted
I don't know if an admin will allow the speedy deletion of the article: a previous request was refused. That's not my call. Regardless, you CANNOT blank the deletion discussion. Please don't do that again. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I did not blank the deletion discussion, but thanks for the vote of confidence, Shawn-star. Hezbollatte (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Toronto municipal election, 2010
Please stop removing content from this article without any explanation. If you do not believe the past election results are relevant, then present an argument. Do not simply remove them. I don't see any reason that information should be excluded. It is useful in allowing readers to access how relevant a candidate State is, just as the information that Tory finished second in 2003 is included in his blurb. - SimonP (talk) 03:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 06:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 00:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)