User talk:Hfmbears

October 2017
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, VeggieTales, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

*Sigh*
Why does almost nobody like my revisions Hfmbears (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Animated films revisions
Your revisions on Watership Down (film) and Freddie as F.R.O.7 are wonderful. You're not the only one feeling unappreciated on contributions. I am too. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Pinocchio and the Emperor of the Night, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The Amazon link you provided may establish where DVDs were released, but does nothing to establish where DVDs were not released. Additionally, I'm not sure that Amazon would qualify as a reliable source in any case, though I'd be willing to let that slide if you want to use that as a source strictly for the information it does "verify". DonIago (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Thomas and the Magic Railroad Theatrical Poster.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ― Abelmoschus  Esculentus  13:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly
Hello, Hfmbears,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pinocchio and the Emperor of the Night, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Looks like we talked about this last year, so I'm a little surprised to see it coming up again. DonIago (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Unsourced editorializing
Please don't add your own personal analysis to articles, as you did to Quest for Camelot. We already have sites likes Rotten Tomatoes to tells us what critics thought, so we don't need editors to come up with their own analysis, such as "mixed-to-negative reviews". People endlessly argue over what Rotten Tomatoes scores can be described as "mixed", "negative", etc, so it's best to just cite what the source says. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Addition of uncorroborated information to Watership Down article
You added the following text to Watership Down (film): "Despite bombing at the United States box office grossing only $3.7 million [sourced to Eberts, Jake; Illott, Terry (1990). My indecision is final, pages 11–12]"

I have this source in my possession and have just checked it:
 * 1) It does not give the US box-office figure.
 * 2) It does not say the film was a "bomb".
 * 3) The source does say on pages 17–18 that the film was "very successful" and that the investors made back 10x their investment.

Do you have an explanation for why the claims you attribute to the source do not appear in my copy, and the fact that my copy appears to state the exact opposite? As a rule investors do not make back 10x their investment if a film bombs. Can you please provide a direct quote so we can get to the bottom of this? Betty Logan (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordon Peters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Palmer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 3×3 Eyes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 03:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)