User talk:Hgd4th

Orphaned non-free image File:Chromatics - Kill for Love.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Chromatics - Kill for Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Since there are still issues with your marking potentially controversial edits as "minor", you can avoid any charges of bad faith editing by just never marking an edit as "minor". It's not really necessary. -- BullRangifer (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Lyme disease shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Misrepresentations in edit notes
Be very careful to not make misrepresentations in edit notes, as you did here. You cannot go back and change an edit note. I did not "suggest" anything like what you did there.Jytdog (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

notice of discretionary sanctions
Jytdog (talk) 21:08, 8 March 2018 (UTC)