User talk:Hhadzimu

All Baker Offense
Another editor has added the  template to the article All Baker Offense, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Reverse Tinkerbell Effect
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Reverse Tinkerbell Effect, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable neologism - grand total of 37 unique GHits including Wikipedia and mirrors

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)