User talk:Hhhggg

Welcome!

 * }

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. When you recently edited Elena Mikhaylova, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slalom, SP and Kirovsk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elena Mikhaylova


A tag has been placed on Elena Mikhaylova, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops, I saw this text too late to explain why I believe the page should not be deleted. Where can I argue the deletion now? Hhhggg (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elena Mikhailova


A tag has been placed on Elena Mikhailova, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 06:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Elena Mikhailova, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. As you are fully aware, a deletion discussion resulted in a consensus to delete Elena Mikhaylova. It is completely unacceptable to attempt to unilaterally overturn such consensus by simply ignoring it and repeatedly re-creating the article, and changing to a different spelling of the title when the original one has been repeatedly deleted does not make it acceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * JamesBWatson, as you can see I asked above how I can argue the deletion now, but he have been kept silence till now. And you also do not talk to me how can I argue the deletion. There was not the consensus to delete the article. Instead of consensus there was arguing which one of administrators ended it with such a strange decision. Look in here to see this. So do not lie please. Hhhggg (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Please note that this is English Wikipedia, and all contributions should be in English. It is a mistake to think that talk page conversations are "private", and that as long as the person addressed understands that is all that matters. All members of the community should be able to follow all discussions. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I write in Russian in English Wikipedia's users' talk pages to communicate with administrators of Russian Wikipedia in cases of blocking me and my talk page in Russian Wikipedia only. All members of the community are able to follow these discussions using on-line autotranslators as I do when I need in this. Hhhggg (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, indeed. Having looked at your contribution history, I have determined that you have, as you say, been using English Wikipedia to evade your block on Russian Wikipedia. Do not continue to do this, or you will be blocked from English Wikipedia too. All communication regarding your block on Russian Wikipedia must be conducted on Russian Wikipedia. As for using English, it is not acceptable to suggest that editors should have to make do with the awkward, time consuming, and inaccurate process of using automatic translators. All communication on English Wikipedia should be in English. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Please give me link to the rule of English Wikipedia forbidding writing in non-English in English Wikipedia's users' talk pages. Hhhggg (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"Stupid cunt" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stupid_cunt&redirect=no Stupid cunt] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)