User talk:Hhtttt

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 04:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Naomi Elizabeth
A tag has been placed on Naomi Elizabeth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Naomi Elizabeth
A tag has been placed on Naomi Elizabeth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Naomi Elizabeth
I have nominated Naomi Elizabeth, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Naomi Elizabeth. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bonewah (talk) 19:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Naomi Elizabeth 2
Thanks for attempting to revert this page to its original state following a blatant act of vandalism by 71.36.101.63 I suspect that the page may be subject to the same problem again in the future. Is it possible to put a temporary block on this IP address as a precaution? Hhtttt (talk) 16:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have warned the person, but not blocked yet. Keep an eye on the article and fix it up.  It looks as if you will need to improve it, and you should certainly argue your case at Articles for deletion/Naomi Elizabeth.  If more vandalism happens that article can be protected.  But as it stands vandalism is not abnormally high. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Personal Infomation
I am not sure you are aware, but the information that was removed can be viewed as article history. Given the issues you are having, you may want to review WP:OS and if it fits, make a request using WP:RFO. Good luck... ttonyb1 (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Jessica Rylan
Nope, no vandalism involved. That was a straight db-band (i.e., non-notable musician or band) deletion. If you want an article about any kind of performer to be taken seriously, by the way, don't create reference links to MySpace or Facebook pages, Twitter, etc. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Naomi Elizabeth portrait 2009.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naomi Elizabeth portrait 2009.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)