User talk:Hiberniantears

Please note: Due to a snafu with my multi-authentication scratch codes and a new phone, I am currently editing from HiberniantearsII.

{| width=100% style="border: 2px grey; padding: 5px; background-color: Maroon" | |- |style="border: 1px grey; background-color: Tan; text-align: left; padding: 5px; font-size:90%;font-family:Trebuchet MS"|

did you create the Denisovan page?
Dear Hiberiantears, First off, I am sorry if I am contacting you in the wrong conduct. I am no wikipedian, and so I am unsure of if creating a new page is the correct way to make contact. Anyhow, I'll get straight to the point. I am a social researcher at Linköping University in Sweden. I am interested in knowledge production in regards to the history of human evolution. I am mapping important contributions linked to new discoveries in the field of evolutionary anthropology, and how they are spread to the public. I am curious, did you create the page for the Denisovan? (linked below) If you did, would you be willing to answer a few questions about the procedure of creating such a page? I would be so very grateful if you would help me.

I have linked my contacts below,

https://liu.se/en/employee/matka36 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Denisovan&offset=20120124164600&limit=500&action=history

Sincerely, Mattis Karlsson, phil.lic, Linköping University

LIU.MK.TQ (talk) 08:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Mattis - Yes I created that page some years back. If I remember accurately, I believe that I ran across the announcement of the discovery in the news. I then checked to see if we had an article that directly covered the topic. Upon seeing that we did not already have an article, I then proceeded to create a stub and build it up to a point that enough credible sources were included and notability of the subject was established to prevent any rapid deletion of the article. My "final" version of the article was here and from that point on the community built it up to where it is today. Hiberniantears (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your response! You have been of great help. Would it be alright with you if I quote your account of events in my research? Also, I may have some further questions, would you be interested in answering them via email? best, Mattis   130.236.159.35 (talk) 11:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Absolutely! Hiberniantears (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1632719&dswid=3760 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:AA1:1026:FE04:A55E:8C2A:5E16:AF50 (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder of this! It was great to look back at some of those other names. Hiberniantears (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Be proud, have another reminder! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Meant to place a note here earlier. Thanks for the update. I currently use 2fa. Hiberniantears (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2289 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Piłsudski Tank, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Although in fairness I could use some help cleaning up the references since I appear to have made a mess of them when I brought the content over from the Polish language article. Hiberniantears (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of The Arlington Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Arlington Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Arlington Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I realize this article has already been deleted. Just weighing in late to say that I am indeed good with this decision. HiberniantearsII (talk) 03:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Not so much inactive, as frozen out by the stupid dual authentication process. I’m editing under HiberniantearsII now. That said, I am fine with removal of the mop at this time. HiberniantearsII (talk) 06:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux  Talk 00:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I’m still around editing low volume over at HiberniantearsII. No need for the mop at this time. HiberniantearsII (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of South Bay Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Bay Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/South Bay Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. LynxesDesmond 🐈 (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)