User talk:Hidden Abilities

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Hidden Abilities, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  19:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC) {{{unblock reviewed | 1=Your reason here | decline = You haven't given a new choice of name. You cannot use the company name or a product name as your username. BTW as your product isn't due out until next year, it might be hard to show notability under WP:CORP with reliable independent sources WP:RS to prove it. Peridon (talk) 22:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)}} I was really not trying to do this a promotion I was putting it up as a history of our company. I promise it was not to spam anyone or to advertise. I was attempting to be as matter of fact and unbiased in my wording as I possibly could. If it helps I will delink our website. I would really like to be unblocked so to make contributions to wiki. Thank you for hearing me out,Hidden Abilities (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Jamee Miller (Hidden Abilities)
 * For this to happen, you will have to include a new username above that is independent from the organization and you'll have to familiarize yourself with how editing works. If and when that happens, I would suggest using Articles for Creation where third-party users including myself can review and confirm if it was acceptable or not. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  06:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)