User talk:Higher Fructose

This has been reverted for the following reasons:

1. Not a neutral point of view. For example, point 4 under controversies does not mention that the investigation was rejected by the same High Court in a later ruling. Points 2, 3, 4, and 6 were also investigated and found to be not true. All findings are easily sourced online. Failure to mention this shows a lack of neutral point of view and show intent to defame and valdalize from the editor.

2. Addition of statements like "the irony is that in" show personal opinion and add extra statements to references.

3. Lack of Encyclopedic content. This section is not written up to the standards of a Wikipedia article and should not be included.

4. Does not follow guidelines of BLP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons)