User talk:Highest Religion

January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at El Shaddai, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Olorun. Omo Obatalá (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

"Objective" and "subjective"
Because you clearly do not understand the difference:
 * "Objective" means something that multiple people can and have observed.
 * "Subjective" means something that can only be verified by the individual as a matter of faith.

What you added to articles is your subjective and personal beliefs. Objective information about religion would be documenting what authors have said about religion, and for such matters Wikipedia cites mainstream academia. If you don't want to do that, that's fine -- but you're going to have to use some other website, because you have to stick with objective and mainstream academia here.

Ian.thomson (talk) 22:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are here not to contribute to building the encyclopedia, but to try to use Wikipedia to publicise your opinions, and because despite messages about the problems with your editing, you persist in editing in ways which are out of line with Wikipedia policies. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)