User talk:Highfield1730

Please do not
Please do not edit this page because I believe that this article is important for people wanting to know information about this sucessful school. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by StrawberryCheesecake66 (talk • contribs)
 * I moved this note from your userpage to your user talk page, hope that's okay. Cirt (talk) 12:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you cirt. StrawberryCheesecake66 please read  What Wikipedia is not  Highfield1730 (talk), specifically WP:NOTMEMORIAL 12:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

SIG SG 550
Hi. Er, we moved it to the Gallery to avoid any edit wars. One of the warrers was quite abusive and is currently under investigation (something to do with "BITE" and "Filipino bandits"). It was moved to the gallery after a discussion over whether the image was even needed on the page ended with us agreeing to a neutral solution... The fight was due to a small percentage of the firearm being seen in the small, low quality image.

We're still going through a solution to the argument and so until we reach a verdict, the image is placed in the gallery. Sorry for any inconvenience, -- OsirisV (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * "Quite abusive" is quite the abusive term. I'd like to defend myself, but it's hard to do when my edits are mischaracterized.  Please do not fiddle with the article mid-consensus building discussion.  OsirisV and I actually agree, but his edit warring was getting in the way of productivity.  That's stopped, please discuss rather than perpetuate the edit war. --Nukes4Tots (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Order on Military police of the United Kingdom
Guess you haven't seen it yet, raised on Talk:Military police of the United Kingdom. ninety:one 21:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Revertion of my edit to CCF
You reverted my edit to the page about CCF about ranks under the grounds of no cititation. However coperal is the same as bombadier and, being in the CCF, is used at some places. -- Imagine Wizard (talk • contribs • count ) Iway amway Imagineway Izardway. 13:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)