User talk:Highland14

The article  on  Salomon  Gluck  has  serious  references  at  the  end,  citing  published  articles,  easily  checked. There were  many  heroes  in  the  history  of  France  and  WWII. Here we  have  a  Jewish  Physician,  out  of  the  country,  who  returns  to  fight  the  war,  is  taken  prisoner,  goes  back  to  civilian  life. Although he  is  not  allowed  to  practice  medecine  because  of  the  racist  Laws  of  Vichy,  he  nevertheless  cares  as  a  physician  for  young  orphans. He enters  the  Resistance  and  finally  is  deported,  in  a  very  special  convoy,  never  to  return. His life  story  shows  many  aspects  of  the  war,  seen  through  the  life  of  an  individual.

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The articles you write will be more quickly accepted if you learn Wikipedia's editing style - see the links above. One space between words and after periods, link important names, events and concepts using double brackets like this, would be a great start. Mak (talk)  16:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

re Salomon Gluck
First of all i have to ask, are you related to this man in some way, the way you write about him makes it seem so, in which case you would have what is known as a conflict of interest, see WP:COI. however that is not my main concern, the problem is that, you are wrong, the refs you have given, are, for the websites, mostly in french, therefore uncheckable to many editors on this english wiki, and the articles, are impossible to check up on. secondly, while i am not denying that the many resistance fighters were not brave, your article shows no reason why gluck is more notable than others, what exactly did he do for the resistance?, was he involved in signficant attacks?, or responsible for major events? etc, if not, i am afraid i see no way this article will last on wikipedia, and sooner or later it will be deleted. finally, simply linking practically every other word is not improvement, in fact it makes the article worse, as you don't check to see if they link to other articles, meaning the page is filled with horrible dead links. all these issues need to be addressed, both on this article, and the other ones you have created, although on the other ones, you need to wikify them even more, they should be in continous prose, as i have attempted to do to gluck, not short, single line paragraphs.--Jac16888 10:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I repeat again that the references are easy to check, look at the New York Times reference, the Jewish Press reference, [=in  English], look at the websites quoted, not counting the  original article published in a special volume in France. It makes no sense to repeat that there is a problem about the references. By the way, I did take into consideration your remarks about judgements : could have remained in England, his interactions  with other prisoners. They are published as such in the volume cited. Thanks for the improvements to the text.


 * if you read the article's talk page you will see that the websites are of little use as references, and as for the newspapers, how is newspaper articles, some over 10 years old, easy to check as a reference? but they are still not the main issue. how is gluck notable?--Jac16888 12:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * btw, you should be making the same improvements to the other articles you created, remember, continous prose not statements, NEUTRALITY, and not linking every single name and date.--Jac16888 12:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Now you tell me that the New York Times, for example, is not easy to check, I certainly disagree. I do appreciate your comments. (Highland14 12:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC))

A tag has been placed on Liliane Ackermann, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Precious Roy 16:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I've removed the tag from the article, because I think it establishes at least some notability, and includes references to third party articles. I would remind everyone to Not bite the new editors, either because you aren't interested int he same areas as they are, or because they don't know about Wikipedia editing style yet. Obviously, a New York Times reference is perfectly acceptable. References in other languages are also acceptable, and I have no idea what Jac1688 is talking about on the Talk:Salomon Gluck that "books and newspaper articles don't actually give any meaning" - paper references are generally acceptable. Mak (talk)  16:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Antoinette Feuerwerker, David Feuerwerker and Liliane Ackermann
Individual people are not to be filed in Category:Biography; that's for articles about biography as a genre of literature or film. People belong in the appropriate subcategories of Category:People. Do not readd the biography category to these articles. Also, do not add Category:Judaism to a person who's already filed in Category:French Jews; Wikipedia does not permit duplicate categorization of this type. Bearcat 04:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Famous people of Strasbourg
Hi, i suggest that you put Salomon Gluck, Rose Warfman and the others into this list, where they actually belong, instead of categorizing them in Category:Strasbourg, where they don't belong. Thank you, cheers, RCS (talk) 11:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Original research
The sentences you reinstated in the Hershel Schachter article are unsourced and WP:OR violations, regardless of how true they may be. Sorry. -- Avi (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That it is true is irrelevant. Please review the core wikipedia policy of verifiability, not truth. Continued disregard for wikipedia policy and guidelines may result in actions being taken to protect the project. At this point, I would also suggest you review the policy on three-reverts/edit warring, as well as the the various things which wikipedia is not, including it is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. -- Avi (talk) 21:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * We need to adhere to the policies and guidelines, otherwise, every article would devolve into a mud-slinging tar-and-feather-fest. Sometimes, true information suffers as a result, but that is the lesser if the two evils when dealing with a project that is the collaborative effort of hundreds of thousands of people with hundreds of thousands of opinions. -- Avi (talk) 23:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Liliane Ackermann
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liliane Ackermann, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Alan Liefting ( talk ) - 21:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Categories
You must avoid adding overly broad categories to articles. Shimon Schwab is already in a relevant subcategory, and really doesn't need to be in Category:Haredi Judaism, which would be completely flooded if we did this. JFW | T@lk  01:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * If you look on Category:Haredi Judaism you will see that it has subcategories. Placing someone in those subcategories will effective place them in Haredi Judaism without overpopulating the main category. JFW | T@lk  01:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on 04:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  02:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique [ approves | this | message  ] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Germaine Ribière
Hello! Your submission of Germaine Ribière at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I received your note on my talk page. It's just a matter of policy to be in touch with both the nominator and the creator of an article when there are questions about the nomination for DYK. In this case, no one addressed the issues I raised and the nomination did not make it to the main page. The article still needs a lot of copy editing and wikifying; there are also French constructions that should be translated into English. Best, Yoninah (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Édmée Schneerson
Hi, I see you started an article on this woman. Can you please explain to me exactly what is notable about her, other than that she is a descendant of Chassidic Rebbes? I was not aware that lineage alone makes one notable according to the standards of wikipedia. Thank you. Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bereck Kofman


A tag has been placed on Bereck Kofman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  00:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Whisperback
Armbrust Talk  Contribs  00:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Armbrust Talk  Contribs  01:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Cookie for you


Armbrust has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Armbrust Talk  Contribs  01:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Édmée Schneerson for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Édmée Schneerson, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Édmée Schneerson until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


 * As reviewing administrator, I thought the nature of the AfD discussion had so far degenerated   that, invoking IAR, I thought it advisable to close, blank, and relist at Articles for deletion/Édmée Schneerson (2nd nomination). I'm sorry that you'll have to give the argument over again, but see my note at the AfD 2. And please avoid mentioning other matters than the article in question. I find it helps to avoid the word "you"--or the names, affiliations, motivations, or past behavior of other editors. I don't like giving formal warnings, let alone blocks,  but please keep in mind that most admins would have felt themselves justified in blocking both you and several other editors on both sides.     DGG ( talk ) 05:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I tried to find more information on Edmee, but it just does not seem to work. To be honest, I think you may not be able to avoid deletion (unless you greatly expand the article). You may want to consider WP:userfication (meaning "make into a user sub-page") if you want think more can be done with it in the future. Later on, if you can find more sources, you may be able to bring it back from userfication. Also, I have to say that the article on her seems inconsistent, saying that she is the grandaughter of Sholom, yet saying she is the daughter of Sholom's brother. I also can't find her listed on any family tree, such as and. — Code Hydro  18:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Flooding articles with categories
Hi Highland14: Thank you for your contributions and you have done great work! But the amount of categories placed on the articles about David Feuerwerker; Antoinette Feuerwerker; Salomon Gluck; Bereck Kofman; Isaac Schneersohn; Schneour Zalman Schneersohn; Rose Warfman go way overboard and is truly absurd. Please see and read Categorization of people. Please do not place every imaginable category in the universe that may be somewhat related. There are plenty of people categories as it is on the page. Sincerely, IZAK (talk) 07:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mechel Reisz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mechel Reisz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mechel Reisz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 20:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Isaac Schneersohn
Bonjour Highland14, est-ce que vous êtes toujours actif sur WP? J'aimerais collaborer sur Isaac Schneersohn, surtout pour rectifier le niveau d'anglais dedans. Cordialement, Mathglot (talk) 21:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * J'aide Mathglot en rectifier l'article. Hill Crest&#39;s WikiLaser! (BOOM!) 03:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Zosa Szajkowski
Hi Hihjland14! I was looking over the edit history of the Zosa Szajkowski page and it seems you wrote the majority of it (shkoyekh!). I am trying to find any relatives of his for a documentary film—do you have any leads? All the best, Ohnoplease (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2020 (UTC)