User talk:Highstakes00/Old talk

Welcome!
Hello, Highstakes00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, visit the Teahouse Q&A forum, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Mar4d  ( talk ) 10:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

In response to your feedback
Hi Highstakes00, and thank you for your feedback. There are a lot of options for choosing what to edit on Wikipedia. I'd suggest starting with an area that you're interested in - you can use Portals to focus on specific topic areas.

Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 14:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Okay :)) --Highstakes00 (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Unblock

 * You may not be Nangparbat, but you weren't blocked as his sock in the first place - you were blocked because Checkuser found two other accounts belonging to you. Given the SPI results nobody seriously thinks you're Nangparbat. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

One is unused and second was used in different place and good cause. I have consented to use my single account. --Highstakes00 (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Reviewing admins, please also see my comment on the SPI case. Elockid  ( Talk ) 21:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ... and thankfully I've already declined one once, because the WP:NOTTHEM in the most recent unblock is absolute bollocks ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * You created Sleek0 as an account as recently as February 29th; I will concede that you have not edited from it, so why did you create it?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

I liked both names and I wanted to take them. Sleek was taken and I got Sleek0. I know it is bad to cast double votes and I caught a double voter from my Repitile1 account. I will like Sleek0 to be unblocked too wikipedia knows both are myself then is it alright to do that after this? --Highstakes00 (talk) 22:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * At this point, because you HAVE violated WP:SOCK, every single other account will need to be indefinitely blocked - you would be formally limited to a single account, and breaking that would lead to ALL you accounts being indefinitely blocked (in case you hadn't noticed, it's a pretty simple technical thing to check). The creation of any further accounts is considered proof you have no desire to follow the rules around here ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 01:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I wish to keep this one then. --Highstakes00 (talk) 03:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello --Highstakes00 (talk) 02:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblock me now I have agreed to use only this account. I answered question by Anthony Bradbury. Agreed to edit by discussing as well. --Highstakes00 (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've contacted the blocking admin, and have placed your unblock request on hold. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks bro. --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

On talk pages
Please read WP:INDENT Darkness Shines (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I will read it. I have seen your comment on admin talk page but I have not followed you to his page. Your tellin him future that I am *going* to follow you. --Highstakes00 (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * (ecx3)Which proves I was right, you are obviously looking at my contributions. Your first actions on Wikipedia were to edit war with me. I cannot help but believe that will continue. I will however give you the benefit of the doubt, we shall see were this goes. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * i am looking at your contributions and you are talking about me behind my back. We are even. No more fighting. --Highstakes00 (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Twinkle
In this edit you expressed a desire to use Twinkle. There are instructions on the twinkle page, working through the green Quick Info section should get you set up. Good luck. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanxx :))) --Highstakes00 (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

WP:PAK
 Mar4d  ( talk ) 10:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Thnx I have joined. --Highstakes00 (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If you would like to continue editing in the contentious topic areas of this project, you can drop a note on my talk page for help and clarifications anytime as I'm well aware of most of the disputes. -- lTopGunl (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thnx bro I will :))--Highstakes00 (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Stop
Follow me to another article for the sole purpose of reverting me and you will be reported. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have this in watchlist for your kind information. see editing history of Repitile1. If you blame again I will tell admin. --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Which has nothing to do with your following me to an article to revert me, I do not give a shit about your sock puppet or what you did with it. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I will edit article I edit before you can not it call following --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This is your last warning, reverting me again for no reason will lead to a report being filled. Adding CN and RS tags are not POV, it is standard practice. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your tag are pov reverting is not offense on wikipedia stop coming to my edits for revenge --Highstakes00 (talk) 17:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Stop following my fucking contributions, I have enough stalkers as it is without you joining the club. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You too STOP attacking me ok? dn call me sock again you are offender now --Highstakes00 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dusty 777 21:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Both editor are in case. keep both name on topic --Highstakes00 (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Read WP:TPG you cannot edit other peoples comments, that includes their section headers. If you want to make a complaint about me feel free to do so. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * TPG does not say that


 * Never address other users in a heading: Headings invite all users to comment. Headings may be about specific edits but not specifically about the user. In general, avoid using editor names in article talk page headings.


 * Never use headings to attack other users: While no personal attacks and assuming good faith apply everywhere at Wikipedia, using headings to attack other users by naming them in the heading is especially egregious, as it places their names prominently in the Table of Contents, and can thus enter that heading in the edit summary of the page's edit history. As edit summaries and edit histories are not normally subject to revision, that wording can then haunt them and damage their credibility for an indefinite time period, even though edit histories are excluded from search engines.[2] Reporting on another user's edits from a neutral point of view is an exception, especially reporting edit warring or other incidents to administrators.


 * dont be bossy with me now ok? --Highstakes00 (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Do I have to do everything for you? "It is generally acceptable to change headings when a better header is appropriate, e.g. one more descriptive of the content of the discussion or the issue discussed, less one-sided, more appropriate for accessibility reasons, etc. To avoid disputes it is best to discuss a heading change with the editor who started the thread, if possible, when a change is likely to be controversial." WP:TPO a section of TPG. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using this account almost exclusively to follow another editor around the project to harass them. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Further explanation of my rationale is here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

If you are not requesting unblock, then don't use the unblock template. Your account appears to be mainly intended to harass another user. Harassment only accounts can and will be blocked. Furthermore you are giving no explanation why this page is an attack page; attack pages are supposed to attack its subject or some other entity and serve no other purpose. B music  ian  08:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I was requesting unblock. I have give explanation this page was listing me in socks when I report . more explaining here Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Darkness Shines/diffs --Highstakes00 (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ...and then your next unblock "request" was to continue to complain about DS, again, without addressing what you have been blocked for. You weren't blocked for "reporting an attack page", but you were blocked for harassing DS (so "I did not follow and harrass Darkness Shines" doesn't make sense). See WP:NOTTHEM; I really hope you can review WP:GAB and make major modifications to your unblock "request". B  music  ian  14:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I do it because he did not report when I go to rfc because he saw I had explanation so he report when I nominate attack page. That is the reason. ok thanx I have change the report and given reason. --Highstakes00 (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I see how Darkness Shines created this page to throw a block at poor highstakes. Highstakes was followed this time. Darkness Shines has a problem with tagging new editors as sock of Nangparbat, he did same with me and result was negative. MFD was reasonable. I advise highstakes to stay away from Darkness Shines and I appreciate that he tried to stay away after last unblock. -- I am Agent   X  12:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow really? I created this page to try and get another editor blocked? Page created 13:50, 7 January 2012. Highstakes created his account 18:06, 24 January 2012. Do you perhaps think I posses a time machine? Darkness Shines (talk) 12:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Stop playing with the meanings of sentences. You know what I am saying. Current face of page is something to delete. You listed me and him on your sock list. I would have done the same if I saw it first. -- I am Agent   X  12:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanx bro for confirm my editing. I did not follow. --Highstakes00 (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment As a neutral observer, I do not entirely agree with this sanction. Highstakes has noted on RFCs that he/she arrived through the request for closure board and that is actually correct per his/her editing history. It is evident that Darkness Shines may have followed HS to the Soviet war article, which according to HS, is an article he/she had a prior interest in or were associated with. I think HS was sticking to his unblock condition as clarified at ANI. In any case, I believe that the blocking admin has jumped the gun by handing an indef block. HS is a new user who is still learning and who has a lot of potential to contribute constructively, so as such, the blocking admin should re-consider this scenario.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 13:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your neutral? Pull the other one. And a few days ago you were accusing me of following anther editor to that article Make your mind up. And as I have already explained twice how I got to that article I can only assume that you have made a mistake with what you have written. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * How many editor do you follow? --Highstakes00 (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * None. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Good joke --Highstakes00 (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I am going to do you a favor here read WP:NOTTHEM and change your unblock request accordingly. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have read WP:NOTTHEM before. Request has relevant diff to this case because my action was nominating your page with procedure and you abuse and report? --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Darkness Shines will no longer post to this page. In return, you will not address comments to him, or talk about him to others, with the exception of answering the reviewing admin's questions. Otherwise, talk page access will be revoked. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok. But one thing problem solve now. This was in report. every one agree on MFD that this page is not right. All this because of this page. it is over now. report was not made when I go to rfc because I explain there about request board. report was about this page nomination it is solved now. --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I will not talk about Darkness Shines now. I replied to Bmusician questions. --Highstakes00 (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Darkness Shines, stay off this talk page, starting now. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * There are now in the English Wikipedia nearly four million articles. Please explain, after all that has happened between you, why you would even consider editing an article which DS has recently edited? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing happened I edited a few article of DS which relate to each other and he thought I was hounding him. My first revert were just when I was a newbie I do not know this guy. I agreed to keep away from his article but I can edit things that I know I do not know much about other topic. I have knowledge about this topic but I will try to stay away or ask a mentor to help. In current case he edit article that I edit and report me that is not my fault. --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd recommend you take the WP:STANDARDOFFER. Come back in six months and then post an unblock request. To admins, I think it would be best to put the unblock request on hold for now. Highstakes00, you need to stop feuding with other people. Khvalamde :  Holla at me   13:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have agree to everything. Wait will not be useful I understand how to edit now I have said I will not edit new article of darkness and I will ask mentor if I need to edit. --Highstakes00 (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * If they cannot even accept the very very generous WP:OFFER - which is above and beyond, considering their level of disruption and abuse - then I see no reason to continue to allow this editor to make unblock requests. Decline, lock, throw away the key for at least a year. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with BWilkins. Highstakes00, If the community's patience with you is already at a narrow end, come back after 6 months and then post an unblock because you've lost the trust on this project. Simply put, log out of Wikipedia and find something else to do on the internet and then come back on Wikipedia in November for an unblock. Because I am not an admin, hopefully admins will direct you to mentorship after your unblock (that is if you agree to consider the standard offer and stay away from Darkness) and then this will all be done and over with. Khvalamde :  Holla at me   13:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment, I am unsure were BWilkins gets that HS was all that disruptive, apart from following myself he was not. I would support an unblock for HS now if he agrees to abide by a 1RR restriction when editing involves myself, quite simply all he has to abide by that and think he will be fine. I think another chance ought to be given. He has been blocked for a while and has no doubt learnded his lesson. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * To Highstakes00, Darkness is right. If you want to come back I believe this is what you need to agree to. Khvalamde :  Holla at me   14:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Fine. Since the original report and disruption was to do with DS, Highstakes, if you agree to a 1RR restriction on any edits that DS makes, I'll unblock you (or some other admin will). Please commit to that on this page. Thanks. --regentspark (comment) 16:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok RegentsPark. I agree to 1RR for Darkness shines revert. I will keep on my agreement to ask experience editor before editing new Darkness shines article until I get experience but I have plan to stay away from his new article. keep in mind he is old editor he can have edited many article before me and I can go to them from wikilink I will keep to my agreement and ask advise if that happen. If Darkness follow me like soviet war article again or create a page of sock list and add me in it like before I will reserve the right to report or ask for deleting. If issue is more then ban our interaction. Is it okay now? --Highstakes00 (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think you have to keep away from DS. He seems quite comfortable with your editing the same areas as he does. Just don't follow him around and remember to stick to 1RR. I suggest you not report or comment directly on DS because this unblock is a very lenient one and would not have happened if DS hadn't requested it (you should thank him!). Stick to content issues, keep to 1RR, and you'll be fine. Good luck. (I'm unblocking you now.) --regentspark (comment) 01:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)