User talk:Hightc

Superconductivity
Please use reliable sources with your edits, especially for strong claims. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This article apparently has neither been peer-reviewed nor widely accepted by the science community, which is required for major new theories to be posted here. Materialscientist (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I know, but this is not good enough for establishing a theory. Materialscientist (talk) 11:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The criterion is the theory should be accepted by the scientific community. This is usually reflected in a number of reliable, secondary sources, such as books and reviews by major specialists in the field (not just a professor) printed by major publishers. Materialscientist (talk) 11:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)