User talk:Hilbert Ryan

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Webzed


A tag has been placed on Draft:Webzed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. creffett (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Frank Zarnowski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &rsaquo; Mortee  talk 12:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I see you tried to accept/reject three other drafts too. Please don't. Adding talk page templates to draft articles isn't how they're reviewed, and only approved participants of AfC can review submitted drafts. Also do not add unsourced information to articles, especially living people, as you did with Javeria Saud's net worth and do not add "page protected" templates to articles that are not protected (only admins can protect pages), as you did at Social experiment and Didactic method. If you're not sure what's allowed and what isn't, please ask at the Teahouse or my talk page but please slow down and be a bit more careful. This is disruptive and will only lead to trouble. &rsaquo; Mortee  talk 12:59, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Final warning
Thus far, you have created two promotional drafts (now deleted), inappropriately "accepted" or "rejected" three other drafts, and flat-out vandalized one:. You then put an "accepted" header on your own draft, and deceptively went to the Teahouse to try to get someone to move it to mainspace. Any more stunts like those, or other types of disruption, and you will be blocked indefinitely. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019: Pub Royale
Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)


 * ==Didactic method==
 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ''You are exactly one disruptive edit from being indefinitely blocked. '' Ad Orientem (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 11:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)