User talk:Hill93

User:SummerPhDv2.0, WP:EVADE - Sum mer PhD v2.0 00:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Disney theatrical animated features, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Disney theatrical animated features
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Disney theatrical animated features. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to To Be a Lover. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sum mer PhD v2.0 23:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Walk Like an Egyptian. Sum mer PhD v2.0 23:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * All of your edits have been reverted (again) as unsourced/unexplained. As noted previously, we have several editors making similar changes. Some of them are clearly incorrect. None of them are sourced. If you continue to make unsourced changes without explanation, they will continue to be reverted and you will be blocked from editing. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 23:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Disruptive editing; persistent additions of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Rlendog (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 20:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Musakhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  06:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

WP:SOCK
Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hill93. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 01:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Might be related to 98.198.33.72. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 01:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1960, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Last Date. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1962
 * added links pointing to The Four Seasons, Return to Sender, I Remember You, Don't Hang Up and Bobby's Girl


 * Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1960
 * added a link pointing to Are You Lonesome Tonight?


 * Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1963
 * added a link pointing to Tell Him


 * Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1965
 * added a link pointing to The Four Seasons

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1961, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ebony Eyes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Great Wall (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Please do not add your own interpretation of whether a film received positive or negative reviews. This is why we have review aggregators listed.'' NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Make It Last Forever (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

FYI, 45cat.com is not a reliable source per WP:ALBUMAVOID. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 19:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at I Know What I Like. ''You've been blocked repeatedly for this. If you continue, you will likely be blocked indefinitely.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * You are also editing while logged out to avoid detection again. You seem to want a site ban. This is your last chance. If you are unsure of anything or disagree, you will need to discuss the issue. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of poorly sourced content and unsourced content while being completely unresponsive to other users' concerns about this behavior since 2016 despite multiple blocks. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)