User talk:HillMountain

Jalna
How is this not the definition of OR? Go to talk. It's attached to a recently-deleted hoax page, that webpage is a redirect to a page that says almost nothing factual and is not a reliable source. Ogress smash! 23:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * OR only applies to things where no reliable sources exist, while that might not be a reliable source, it does not mean that none exist. HillMountain (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Son. Wikipedia disagrees with you very specifically: "The phrase 'original research' (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.[1] This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." They have not done that. At all. Ogress smash!  23:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've undone the edit. HillMountain (talk) 01:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Lois Lane (Smallville)
Fine, I won't revert your change due to I want to avoid edit wars, but be sure to condense it per Wikipedia's policy.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)