User talk:Hill Pro Audio

March 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲 水 09:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Really?
"Many other of their rival companies who have also added themselves to Wikipedia and done the exact same}? Created spammy user page names and promoted themselves on WIkipedia? I would be very interested in a list.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-ACOUSTICS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_Sound_Laboratories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Audio

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundcraft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behringer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio-Technica

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBL

- My intentions were to create a page similar to these, outlining the history of the company. If I have been banned from doing this, how is it possible for them to do the exact same?

Regards

Well, at first glance, they are not spammy user pages created by someone connected with the subject. At least two have significant coverage from reliable sources unconnected with the subject. I'll look them over and see if they are deletable, once I get home from work and get some sleep. thanks.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

I apologise if anything I have written in draft was regarded as 'spammy'. The person who created other company Wiki articles must have been connected to them in some form to warrant a wiki creation? I appreciate my article draft was lacking sources - something I am more than happy to amend as I develop a working article.

Again, sorry if it has come across as spammy - my intent was purely to create a factual non-biased wiki on the company. I am more than happy to create more citation etc if the draft has too little in terms of connections.

Thank you for taking the time.

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhosting service. Wikipedia is not a place to post personal content, host personal websites, or do things that are not directly related to adding to or improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)