User talk:Hillzy1234

December 2010
Your recent edits appear to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not change statements that cite a source to a version that contradicts that cited source, as you did e.g. here and here. Regards, HaeB (talk) 12:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Marshall Mathers LP, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Marshall Mathers LP was changed by Hillzy1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-11-01T11:26:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ready to Die, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 17:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)