User talk:Himansu36

On operating multiple accounts
Please read WP:SOCK. I am also leaving this notice at User talk:Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh. AllyD (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramesh Chandra Parida


The article Ramesh Chandra Parida has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 15:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mayadhar Swain


The article Mayadhar Swain has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mayadhar Swain


A tag has been placed on Mayadhar Swain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Mundamba) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mundamba, Himansu36!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The page is reviewed."

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''As before, I remind you of WP:SOCK. '' AllyD (talk) 17:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Centre For Science Communicators


A tag has been placed on National Centre For Science Communicators, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kaimahi (talk) 08:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. AllyD (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AllyD (talk) 06:45, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Er. Mayadhar Swain
Hello Himansu36,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Er. Mayadhar Swain for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mayadhar Swain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayadhar Swain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mayadhar Swain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 17:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)