User talk:Hinahanif90

External links and reliable sources
Please do not add external links to pages unless they meet the appropriate criteria and are not copyright violations. In addition, to be used as a inline citation, a source must be reliable. The urdu novels link does not appear to meet any of these criteria. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Urdunovelspdf.com is not a reliable source. Moving it from the external links section to an inline citation does not magically change the sourcing. There is no actual content the page that could be used, even if the site were sufficiently reliable to be used as a citation.  There is also no indication of whether the link poses copyright problems, and copyright is taken very seriously on wikipedia.  Between you and the anonymous IP that also keeps adding the link (119.152.84.228 ) the link has been added and removed far too many times without any discussion on any talk page.  The link gives every appearance of being simple spam designed to promote the website.  I am going to bring this up at requests for page protection and the spam blacklist.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 18:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Only warning
Adding links to copyright violations on Wikipedia is against our terms of use, because it can be considered "contributory infringement." If you continue to add links to copyright violations, you will be blocked without further warning. Thank you,  Malinaccier ( talk ) 19:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

February 2012 (http://spam.urdunovelspdf.com)
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MER-C 06:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)