User talk:Hinata Ryunosuke

Welcome!
Hello, Hinata Ryunosuke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Staying together(book), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dogsix (talk) 03:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Staying together(book)


The article Staying together(book) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTBOOK applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 03:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add refs to your edits
Hi I see you are adding short descriptions to a number of species stubs. Could you please add the source of these descriptions? At the moment all are unreferenced and should thus technically be removed. I'm assuming that you are using the same source for all of these, so I hope it won't be much of a problem to prepare a well-formatted reference once and add it to these sentences. Cheers! - Elmidae  (talk) 07:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi You seem not to have taken the above request on board. Please note that it is a requirement to cite sources for all content you add to an article. I have reverted your latest unsourced additions. Come on, you clearly have a source for these, would you please state it? --  Elmidae  (talk) 08:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * OY - do you read your talk page at all? Further reverts because you don't provide your source! Please do get with the program.--  Elmidae  (talk) 12:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Bird of prey stubs
Hello,. I recently created a new stub template for Accipitriformes so that we can match the taxon in the stub box to the order in the taxobox. I hope you will find it useful.

The split of Accipitriformes from Falconiformes is fairly well accepted now, and Falconiformes is just a redirect to Falconidae. You can compare Category:Falconiformes stubs versus Category: Accipitriformes stubs.

Pelagic (talk) 13:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hartert's fig parrot


A tag has been placed on Hartert's fig parrot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ches (talk) (contribs) 11:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Papa Mama Bye bye


The article Papa Mama Bye bye has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptRik (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Struck by Black Rain


The article Struck by Black Rain has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptRik (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tagula's Fig Parrot


The article Tagula's Fig Parrot has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, should be notable, just needs more sourced information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptRik (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hartert's double-eyed fig parrot


The article Hartert's double-eyed fig parrot has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, should be notable just needs sourced information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptRik (talk) 21:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Tetsuji Fukushima, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk to us
Here you will see a plea from that you should communicate. I have blocked you. But a) you are still able to edit this page and b) I propose that you should be unblocked as soon as you reply to Elmidae's messages above and confirm that you will not create any more articles which are completely devoid of sources. I have restored Hartert's fig parrot to User:Hinata Ryunosuke/sandbox. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of manga cliches


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that List of manga cliches, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tetsuji Fukushima


A tag has been placed on Tetsuji Fukushima requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of manga cliches (April 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of manga cliches and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_manga_cliches Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_manga_cliches reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Papa Mama Bye bye for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papa Mama Bye bye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Papa Mama Bye bye until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaptRik (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)