User talk:HindsightKaduna

October 2020
Hello HindsightKaduna. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HindsightKaduna. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 11:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Victor Schmidt mobil. I noticed that you recently removed content from AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your edi summary did not explain why you removed the sourced content. Please also familarisize yourself with WP:REFBEGIN.'' Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 11:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Asartea  Talk    Contributions  10:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Asartea  Talk    Contributions  10:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Victor Schmidt. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The subject's website is only of limited use per WP:SELFPUB Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 12:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)