User talk:Hingsten69

Your draft article: Draft:MediCorrupt
Hi @Hingsten69.

Your article draft currently cites no sources. Every fact and statement in your article needs to be backed up by independent and reliable sources. This is so anyone can verify that the statements in your article are accurate and to ensure that your topic is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia.

It might be worth reading Your first article which gives you the dos and don'ts of creating an article.

The easiest way to fix this draft is to find sources that cover MediCorrupt in detail, and then summarise them in your own words. That should make up the content of your article draft. Note that the sources must be:


 * - Reliable: Your article should rely on strong, reliable sources and published by reputable institutions. Primary sources can be used for basic facts (such as a date of birth), but they should be supplemented with strong secondary sources that offer analysis or interpretation.
 * - Independent: Your sources should be independent of the subject, for example not self-published or from the subject's own website.
 * - Show significant coverage: Your subject should be discussed in detail in the sources you find. The sources should provide in-depth information about the subject, going beyond basic facts or promotional material.
 * - From multiple places: You should find at least three separate strong, reliable, secondary sources that discuss your subject.
 * - Not Original Research: Wikipedia articles should summarise existing knowledge about a subject, not present new research. This means you should avoid drawing your own conclusions or analyses from the sources. Stick to summarising what the sources say in a neutral tone.

If you cannot find sources then I am afraid that MediCorrupt would not meet the notability threshold at this time and therefore cannot have a Wikipedia article. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for any type of self-promotion or advertisement.

Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 10:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MediCorrupt (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Actualcpscm was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MediCorrupt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:MediCorrupt Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Actualcpscm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:MediCorrupt reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Actualcpscm (talk) 11:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:MediCorrupt


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:MediCorrupt, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)