User talk:Hippycatkin

March 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Clare Dimyon has been reverted. Your edit here to Clare Dimyon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/BDimyon/status/1237419062453571587?s=20) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

For Women Scotland
Hi Hippycatkin. I have reverted your edit to For Women Scotland for a couple of reasons: Let's keep just an eye on this matter for now. I don't know whether it will rise to being suitable for coverage in Wikipedia. It might well do but, even if it doesn't, it sounds like it could be... interesting. ;-) --DanielRigal (talk) 12:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) We don't know for certain what the deal with Millar's name really is or whether her name is even the real story here. I hear rumours on Twitter but they are vague. If anything comes out of this to the point that it is written about in reliable sources then we can cover it using those as a guide.
 * 2) Even if Millar is not her legal name, on Wikipedia our policy is to refer to people using their common name (e.g. David Bowie not David Jones). We can not be hypocrites about this. Whatever we may think about her personally, we must extend the same consideration to her as to trans people who may not have got around to changing their legal names yet, or who may be prevented from changing their legal names by discriminatory legislation. As yet, we have no reliable information that she has used multiple names for an improper purpose.

Fair enough. However I am wondering why you removed that she was their accountant?

Thanks Hippycatkin (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I thought the original text covered it sufficiently but I have no objection to your change making it more explicit. DanielRigal (talk) 20:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

I think it may turn out to be quite relevant, if what I have heard is true. But as you said the rest of my edits were based on speculation and you are right to advise waiting for confirmation. Thank you for pulling me up on it so diplomatically. Hippycatkin (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

For Women Scotland discretionary sanctions notices
Sandy Georgia (Talk)  17:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to For Women Scotland have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to For Women Scotland was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/davieclegg/status/1592954263512453121?t=onIEQN08TAApkGtQ3tc1TA&s=19) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)