User talk:Hiral118

Welcome!
Hello, Hiral118, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Opencooper (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bhandardara. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 05:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bhandardara. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 12:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hiral (talk) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)I was just trying to see what qualifies as being proper edits. Don't want to engage in any edit war. How can we get proper reliable sources?
 * You'd have to search for them. Each source has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. For starters you can read the guideline for identifying reliable sources. it cannot be self-published and it has to be authored by someone reliable; for example the New York Times is definitely reliable, while some guy's blog is not. For areas, a good place to look would be google books for book publications on the subject. However it absolutely cannot come from your head or personal experience; that is original research and is not verifiable. Opencooper (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)