User talk:Hirolovesswords/Archive 3

DYK for Harry C. Foster
Orlady (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Appleton's Pulpit
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Samuel Appleton (born 1625)
The DYK project (nominate) 14:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Small DYK issue
Hi, can you follow up here? Thanks.  Go  Phightins  !  23:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ronald MacKenzie
Hello! Your submission of Ronald MacKenzie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for MBM scandal
Cheers and thanks, hope you are having a good weekend Victuallers (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for James A. Kelly, Jr.
Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ronald MacKenzie
Thank you for helping the wiki Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pierre Pascau
slakr \ talk / 08:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elaine Trebek Kares
Hello! Your submission of Elaine Trebek Kares at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure you ever saw this—it appears that you weren't pinged here before now—but it's been a month, so I'm hoping you can address it very soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Stephen W. Doran
ThaddeusB (talk) 20:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hogan's Heroes edit
You removed a large portion of the Hogan's Heroes article under the guise that it was commentary and original research. While I agree with that in some areas, how can you consider fully cited sections such as where the series was filmed and how the series was received to be original research or commentary? There are other sections that you removed that should have remained but need references such as the fact that most of the actors were Jewish and comfortable with the series. That balances the section on criticism of the series. Before I restore these areas, I'd like to hear your logic as to why you think they don't belong. Dbroer (talk) 14:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

FYI, I've replied to your assertions on my talk page. Please let me know what you would find suitable as a reliable reference so that I can find appropriate references per your request. I've gone back and found many references confirming several statements/facts related to the show but I don't want to get into an edit war because they don't meet your approval. I'd also ask that before you make wholesale deletions that you at least place a citation needed tag and give authors an opportunity to supply them. You can also bring up issues on the talk page. You've clearly done some massive editing to the Hogan's article and have not contributed anything besides removing content and I don't think it's right to make wholesale changes by one person without any discussion. Dbroer (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 7 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Paul Holmgren page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607427497 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F607427497%7CPaul Holmgren%5D%5D Ask for help])

Reference Errors on 9 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Hogan's Heroes page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607735708 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F607735708%7CHogan's Heroes%5D%5D Ask for help])

Article I made on Mark Fisher
I wish you didn't try to delete my article I created. I worked very hard on it and I took so much time to do. I can provide you more info on him, he has plenty of media coverage:

http://wwlp.com/2014/05/13/massachusetts-gop-certifies-mark-fisher-for-ballot/

I have more as well. Kegejoeco (aka Plyjacks) (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I was disappointed with my Mark Fisher article being deleted but I not going to fight it because Wikipedia is too strong and I won't win. I'll just say this having nothing to do with Mark Fisher at all. The point being is the Democratic party is more stronger in Massachusetts and Joseph Avellone will have a harder chance in the primary with especially Martha Coakley and Steve Grossman being on the high top. Joseph Avellone is receiving way less media attention than Steve Grossman or even Martha Coakley, Martha Coakley is the front runner right now in the Governor election. Many are saying Martha Coakley has 51%, Steve Grossman 7%, Juliette Kayyem 4%, Donald Berwick 3% and Joseph Avellone only has 1% in the May polls. I just want to be safe and want to no longer want to post on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone article deletion page but I want others to stop and think about what I said too with Grossman and especially Coakley in the lead in the 2014 Massachusetts Governors race.Kegejoeco (aka Plyjacks) (talk) 19:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Dewey Defeats Truman
The article, as it stands, is unduly apologetic and protective of the Tribune. The article attempts to blame the "mistake" on a labor strike. That is nonsensical and illogical. Perhaps the Tribune did not have the resources to investigate the matter, obtain information, and write a proper article, but rather than admit that, it decided, in reckless disregard of the truth, to publish a headline that turned out to be false. As long as the article is going to contain Tribune apologetics, it should include a line pointing out the deficiency in the apologist's reasoning. John Paul Parks (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

List of Speakers of the Massachusetts House of Representatives
You're right, I read the entire article via a Proquest database and it does not say he resigned. Replacing a cited source with uncited material raises red flags, but in this case you are right and my apologies for reverting you. Since you have some knowledge of this subject, perhaps you could improve the John N. Cole article? Gamaliel ( talk ) 03:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for John N. Cole
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site
The DYK project (nominate) 02:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Montowampate
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm Tracer9999. I noticed that you recently removed some content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_D._Baker,_Jr.

If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

''do not blank sourced material without consensus. First you deleted most of the section stating it was too long.. then went back and deleted the rest without a comment..that would be pushing a non neutral point of view or more appropriatly attempting to remove a fact. then you once again deleted the whole item after it was restored.... claiming its not neutral. it is NPOV as sourced from a major metropolitan newspaper. I didnt even add the first part just removed the part which was not factually accurate. also the issue being a constitutional one and relating to a political office certainly needs to be mentioned and explained. there are few things mentioned about the election which is why it seems more space is being taken on this topic.. regardless DO NOT remove sourced info without getting consensus because you have the opinion its not relevant. nothing of what is said is remotely factually inaccurate. thanks'' Tracer9999 (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There's a discussion on the BLP noticeboard that is relevant here. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Kickback schemes
Very nice job on the kickback schemes article. I hope you'll be taking it to DYK? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=625598411 your edit] to Warren Tolman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * 1998]], Governor of Massachusetts in 2002, and [Massachusetts Attorney General] in 2014.

DYK nomination of Demoulas family
Hello! Your submission of Demoulas family at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Demoulas family
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Welcome to the Jungle (Neon Jungle album)
Hirolovesswords, I was wondering whether you were planning to return to this DYK review, or whether I should call for a new reviewer. Please let me know here if not; if you do, then I'll see your posts there. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:08, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Market Basket protests
Hello! Your submission of Market Basket protests at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Carlojoseph14 (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hiroloveswords, there remain significant close paraphrasing issues with the article. Please stop by the nomination to let us know when you plan to address them. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello. Your nomination has just been reviewed. It has been approved, although you may want to make a final check of the results, as other editors dealt with the article's paraphrasing problem.Georgejdorner (talk) 02:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for MBTA kickback schemes
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Market Basket protests
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your article
on Melzar Hunt Mosman is a thing of wonder. I have made a few what I hope you will view as improvements in it. Life is good. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Request on 14:51:10, 27 December 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Grace and Fuller
Hi

Thank you for reviewing our Wikipedia entry submission.

I tried to keep the content factual and whilst most of the data I am citing is found on our website Grace and Fuller, it is a) testimonials are independently written by medical professionals who can be verified and b)the document called Science Behind Expian is a scientifically written document with more than 100 citations relevant to the subject field.

I can bring in some of the scientific papers cites within "Science Behind Expian" but I had thought that 'discussing' in part, the merits of some of these papers vis-à-vis our product and the website would be of lesser merit.

I will work on the submission request a little more today. I intend adding the chemical structures for both beta-caryophyllene and eugenol along with the correct nomenclature (much like the Wikipedia entry for 'nabiximols' aka 'Sativex'; I will also add a professional photo of the product.

I can also cite letters that we have sent to The Canadian Cancer Society and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada, asking that they consider Expian (the product) for us in cancer and MS pain.

My point is not to produce an 'advertisement' per se, but like any Wiki article, to provide useful data and facts, not least for others to be better informed and to enable informed decisions.

Can whomever reviewed our submission stay with me and help to produce through 'pointers', an article which is closer to your requirements?

Kind regards

Donna Evans

Grace and Fuller (talk) 14:51, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Request on 19:37:52, 2 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ronhjones
Hi, Re: Draft:Robbie Glover - I seems to be going backwards with this article. It was not created by me, I just decided to take it over - it was originally started in 2008. After the first review I submitted, I asked the reviewer for comments - (User_talk:Dodger67/Archive_8). which all seemed logical, so I then set about writing it in a format that would be acceptable. The second review needed more sources, so I tracked down as many as I could (it's not easy, as it's a UK artist who's got to No.1 twice in Eastern Europe, rather than in the UK - at least that part in documented on the BBC!). So I'm not really sure how many more sources I need to find (if they can be found) - I know the best ones are obviously the ones that cannot be written by the subject - i.e the BBC, The Stage, The Sun, IUMA, etc. Other refs are just there to show his songs have been covered by many other artists as he is also a songwriter as well as a singer. Any suggestions would be useful. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Ron h jones (Talk) 19:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (drone)  @ 09:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:01:43, 9 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 156.40.193.13
Which information is copyrighted in the article? And how do I show that it is okay for this information to be published? To my knowledge, I do not think any of the information was copyrighted.

156.40.193.13 (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

19:34:54, 12 January 2015 review of submission by Mrlarrin
I am submitting this re-review as based on the current guidelines and Scott's career and media appearances he does meet the minimums for being note worthy. I mentioned the Congressional hearing, linked the media interviews and in no way is the post self serving or advertorial. I am confident others may come to the page and make more inclusions. I am new to Wikipedia, so if you decline once more, would you please let me know what I can do to get the article included.

Larrin Devereaux Marrisett (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of David Alexander Flinn page
I am trying to submit an article about model/artist David Alexander Flinn. The article was removed, saying that it was almost identical to a paragraph found on http://theinfinitypool.com/, but I had intended to cite that as a source. Am I doing something wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLionsNY (talk • contribs) 18:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

21:04:57, 13 January 2015 review of submission by Glassell69
Hiro -

Thank you for your response on my recently submitted article on composer Elizabeth Alexander. I am surprised that so many of her colleagues are featured in Wikipedia, while Alexander's international influence on contemporary composition is absent.

You had noted that the article seemed to be more of a "marketing" piece. This is not the intent, for as you know, talking about artists' ouevre can seem close to marketing. I have seen many reviews quoted on other composers' wikipages, which like Alexander's articles work to both describe the work and tell the influence of their works - for published criticism, even academic examination, is of course subjective.

I will edit the article toward neutrality and external sourcing, as recommended.

Thank you, and please look forward to my resubmission.

Glassell69 (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 05:21:28, 15 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Glassell69
Article for ELIZABETH ALEXANDER (COMPOSER) resubmitted, per your request. Thank you, Hirolovesswords. - Glassell69

Glassell69 (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mellcene Thurman Smith
The DYK project (nominate) 08:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 21:47:56, 16 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Grace and Fuller
Hi

I'm back because parts of my sandbox entry are available for public view on Google. I tried entering, for example, Grace and Fuller analgesic and this entry is #1: Fuller/sandbox Archives - Wikipedia Recent Change Post wikirecent.com/topics/fullersandbox/ Dec 26, 2014 - ”'Expian”' is a patented (applied for ) phytocannabinoid-terpenoid topical analgesic and ...

I thought the point of a sandbox was to experiment knowing that the work won't be published. Can you help me remove this, please? It isn't professional. Thanks. I appreciate any advice. Donna

Grace and Fuller (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Richard M. Osgood, Jr.
Why have you declined this draft? Osgood is Higgins Professor of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics at Columbia University. So he meets criterion 5 on Notability (academics). --Ephraim33 (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 15:32:23, 18 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Grace and Fuller
Hi - thank you for applying No INDEX. I tried entering the words Grace and Fuller analgesic once more and unfortunately, the page I previously referred to is still the number one hit on Google. Can you just delete the sandbox I created? Would this produce the solution?

Kind regards

Donna

Grace and Fuller (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've deleted it. It does take a few days for things to clear from the search engines. The spiders have to make another trip around. Peridon (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including John S. Parsons, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 22:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

00:28:56, 20 January 2015 review of submission by Historyofrichland
Requesting the editor suggest the specific resources needed for approval of the topic Don Bryant (politician). The topic is notable in the City of Mansfield's history. Bryant is the youngest person to serve in the council at-large position and is not a temporary figure. What type of proof is needed? Historyofrichland (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

10:48:50, 22 January 2015 review of submission by Ajbara
The bio of H.E. Hussain al Nowais is the same in all the websites of his companies or affiliates. how can I paraphrase the sectors he is experience in, it is impossible?

I think the article in not taking anything from his bio which appears Emirates Steel Website (he is a chairman there), it is simply facts and i cited all the websites including the Emirates Steel.

Please re-review my article and let me know what I should do.

regards,

--Ajbara (talk) 10:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Ajbara (talk) 10:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Richard W. Mayo
Nice expansion work! Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 18:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 14:28:55, 23 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by WPMHAWKINS
My first attempt at posting something on Wikipedia. Wanted to know why my submission was rejected. I wrote the material. It was copied straight from my university's webpage, but as SID I wrote the article. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

WPMHAWKINS (talk) 14:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Arthur E. Chase
I don't understand what copyrighted items I had posted. All of the text was reworded/summarized, except for the quotes in the reference box.

1. Please let me know which items were copyrighted so that I can repost them correctly.

2. If I am not supposed to copy-paste text into the Quote box of the reference template, please explain what it is intended for so that I can use it properly? My understanding was that I am supposed to quote the original author to justify the text that I wrote.

Thank you in advance, Unclefeet (talk) 07:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

10:37:49, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Kaernbach
Hi, I was a student of Prof. Vogel, so the basis of the article is personal knowledge. All the information is available in the works by Martin Vogel, which I cited. What type of reference would you desire?Kaernbach (talk) 10:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Kaernbach (talk) 10:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 26 January 2015 for assistance on Draft:Rogers Partners Architects+Urban Designers and Draft:Robert M. Rogers submissions by schung17
Hi Hiro, I've made revisions to both articles based on your suggestions. I've put in secondary reliable sources that are evidence of the subjects' notability (e.g. summary description, awards, history, etc.). Can you please re-review the articles to see whether I can resubmit or else if I may make any other improvements? Thank you so much.

schung17 (talk) 1:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK review of Canada Job Grant
Hi there. I noticed in your review of the Canada Job Grant DYK that you didn't add a mark to signify whether the article needs more work, fails the criteria, or passes. (Given your review, I assume it passes.) Could you please add the correct mark so DYK admins can properly process the entry. Thanks. Mind matrix  18:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

hey, stop, combine Harvard residence house AFDs
Hey, i commented at Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University) already, but then I see new AFDs for two more opened. Could you please make it one wp:MULTIAFD. I already was going to Talk pages like Talk:Cabot House and giving notice to comment at the Mather AFD, which i saw first. Reduce duplication.

The notice I was posting is: "There's a proposal to merge this article into a larger one to be created, List of Harvard residence houses and dormitories. Discussion at Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University).  The larger list-article could possibly be created by moving List of Harvard College freshman dormitories to the new title, then merging in info about this and 12 other residence houses.  Comment at the discussion there, not here.  Please consider Wikipedia policy and guidelines if you comment.  Note that wp:GNG standard requires substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, for a topic to have a separate Wikipedia article." I was going to note this at the central, Mather AFD, of course.

I'll watch here. Can we have just one discussion, please? -- do ncr  am  21:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I am not disagreeing with your perspective that these articles aren't great. AFDing is valid, sure.  This is about:
 * Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University)
 * Articles for deletion/Dudley House (Harvard College)
 * Articles for deletion/Cabot House (2nd nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Currier House (Harvard College)
 * and any more of the 13 residence houses you'd AFD.
 * I was hoping you'd combine the discussions using wp:MULTIAFD. Or, if you don't think criteria for that are met, and you prefer separate AFD discussions, could you add a short note yourself, linking to the other related AFDs? (and perhaps briefly stating why they are separate, why this one is different?).  I am just trying to help organize discussion, at this point.-- do  ncr  am  21:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, i see your note at one of the AFDs, that the articles vary enough. Okay, i am just adding a short note below your nom statement in each one, linking to the others... objectively/properly i hope. -- do  ncr  am  22:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding the note. I was going to do that myself, but hadn't gotten around to it yet. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Morris B. Belknap
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for John S. Parsons
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Victor Clough Rambo
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for David I. Robinson
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Richard W. Mayo
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for R. Fraser Armstrong
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Francisco Urena
Harrias talk 12:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Five All Night, Live All Night
Hello! Your submission of Five All Night, Live All Night at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)