User talk:HisSpaceResearch/Archive 5

Help to get an article deleted
Can you please tell me how to get the article Aberdeen F.C. achievements deleted because, although I created it, I have since discovered that the identical information contained on the page is already used in a another article. This is a mistake due to the main article Aberdeen F.C. gaining sub articles to reduce the length of the main page.

Could I please ask if you could respond to my user page, thanks Dreamweaverjack (talk) 04:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Achievements of telecom sector during 2004-2007
Hi HSR. I have declined to speedy this, certainly per WP:SNOW which I can't see is a valid reason at all for CSD (?). However I agree it's a rotten article so you may well wish to add input at the above debate. Cheers! Pedro : Chat  13:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Advance enzymes
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Advance enzymes. The reason is:
 * not copyvio from that URL, and I can't find a different one which this is from. Feel free to retag if you can find the site this was copied from.

For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
for the * ! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Request for rollback
Granted. Rudget . 17:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Dorftrottel & AfD
Actually, User:Dorftrottel did chill out days ago. I know he's demonstrated that on my talk page, if not here. Unschool (talk) 23:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mohammed bin Osama bin Laden
Thanks for your message. I explained my views on the subject on the deletion page. All the best, Rsazevedo (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Songs in Lemmings
I answered your question; feel free to have a look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneWeirdDude (talk • contribs) 20:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rogerchapmanliveinhamburg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rogerchapmanliveinhamburg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC) ✅. Wwwhatsup (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Mrbrownshoes
Just want to explain something here - I screwed up, I didn't do my research. WP:PROD says The only exceptions to this rule are pages in the User and User talk namespaces which may be proposed for deletion if the user has no recent edits and has made few or no contributions to the encyclopedia., which is the case here...it's just an unusual move, and most people trying it are doing it on someone who was blocked 2 days before. I've added a prod2 that expands your rationale so it's more in line with the "exception", but honestly, I don't see the harm in keeping the page and just blanking it. --UsaSatsui (talk) 07:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk page speedy
Re this, if we deleted all the talk pages with nonsense on them... lol... seriously, it's fine. --Dweller (talk) 14:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

DYK next update
Howdy! I noticed that you recently promoted your own nom of Nikki Catsouras to Template:Did you know/Next update. Ideally, you would want an uninvolved and objective editor to promote your own nom so that there is not any appearance of impropriety--especially when you have had some editors express concerns about the article/hook. I have no problems with hook myself, and certainly won't remove it from the update, but I do want to forewarn you that another editor might notice your promotion and remove it themselves. AgneCheese/Wine 16:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I also saw the hook. I reworded it because it's a bit speculative. Most defendants in a lawsuit have the potential to lose and pay damages. WP shouldn't take sides. The hook may be seen as one sided. Have you put your own hook on next update? That's not suppose to happen. With the new rules for length, there are fewer hooks so others will decide and likely choose most hooks. Archtransit (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

standards
I was not familiar with the Heymann Standard. So thanks for drawing it to my attention.

As I wrote in my final comment, I think RHaworth was correct, and the article should be merged with Communications in Pakistan.

But I am puzzled by your standards. If Communications in Pakistan didn't exist why would you argue for deletion of the current state of the article? Doesn't WP:DEL make clear that whether an article should be deleted should depend on a judgment on the merits of the article's topic, not the article's current state?

We aren't discussing whether this article merits featured article, or good article status, after all. If the Communications in Pakistan article didn't exist, this article would be a useful stub. I had no idea how much growth Pakistani telephony had experienced recently.

FWIW I would have argued for keeping the original version of the Heymann article, on the grounds (1) notable professors merit coverage; (2) a professor of architecture chosen by the POTUS to be his architect satisfies the "notable professor" clause.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I got your reply.


 * What I was curious about was -- are you saying that the current state of the article should be deleted -- if it weren't going to be merged with Communications in Pakistan?


 * Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Buccaneer Yacht Club
Please see Talk:Buccaneer Yacht Club. You seem to have a habit of flagging new articles for speedy deletion.Trilobitealive (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD
I respectfully request that you withdraw your AfD for Deletionist versus Inclusionist Controversy, now that you've stated that your original intent was to discuss a merger. An appropriate place for that discussion would be the article's talk page. Tarinth (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

NorthamptonParkFC
You need to put a deletion debate template on the page! Poeloq (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa
Well, not this time anyway it seems...my effort to regain my adminship was unsuccessful, but your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 07:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Actors who died in their 20s
Hey I just wanted to let you know that, if you renominate the article, make sure to make it clear the article cannot be categorized due to consensus from WP:CfD. This AfD discussion has frustrated me beyond belief as users have refused to listen to the fact that WP:CfD has a long standing precedent that categories such as this should not exist. Meanwhile, the only people voting keep are voting based on WP:USEFUL and WP:LOSE (an admin of all people is arguing "we have to have either a category or a list, therefore keep the list"; rather scary this person was promoted). If this is closed as non-consensus, I'm seriously considering taking it to deletion review as no one has given a good reason so far to keep it. Redfarmer (talk) 08:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Atlantic Records
It isn't good faith; check the history. Since last September, the "You suck" has been rv'd constantly. Will (talk) 22:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Could you please have a look?
Hey, could you please have a look at some articles I tagged few min back. You'll find them on AfD debate log. It seems that those articles are full of vanity claim. Your observation will help us to reach a consensus. Cheers. -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  15:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your feedback. Cheers. -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  16:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

A subtle note
Not meaning to annoy, but.....   WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  play it cool.  19:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Welcome, thanks in advance. No one else is going near the article.   WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  play it cool.  20:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
I am not one for sending round pretty pictures, but after my recent RfA, which passed 68/1/7, I am now relaxed and this is to thank you for your support. I will take on board all the comments made and look forward to wielding the mop with alacrity. Or two lacrities. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 21:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Beinn a Bhuird
Thanks - I was in the process of creating this 'stub' and I got jumped. I'd just done a cut-n-past job and saved it 'just to see' that it was ok - then I get speedy deletions etc. (geeze) WikiWriter (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * like this? Thanks for the tips - you're right I should do that, just didn't think I was being watched that closely :-) I know better now (thanks again) WikiWriter (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Question for you! Taling about Beinn a Bhuird - considering what I quoted what Watson said about pronouncing the name - BUT - I've spent a lot of time up there and only ever heard the locals pronounce the name like Ben A Voord. Any thoughts about how I can add this without it sounding like 'just my opinion'? WikiWriter (talk) 10:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's sort-of what I was thinking too - good luck with the new job - thanks WikiWriter (talk) 07:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Allanah scully
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Allanah scully, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Allanah scully is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Allanah scully, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Corey Worthington
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Corey Worthington. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. AW (talk) 19:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Small note
I just wanted to note something I saw at Articles for deletion/BoyBand. You said that All Music Guide is extremely comprehensive. I've been using AMG daily for over a year now, and I can say that it has very good coverage of American music, especially recent American music, to the point of near-compehensivity. But its coverage of non-American music (including Canadian and British music, even) is often very spotty, and so the lack of an AMG entry for non-American bands is something I take lightly in looking for notability. This is no comment about BoyBand itself, and I'm not questioning the AfD, but I thought it'd be worth pointing out my experiences here. Chubbles (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've written articles for a number of American bands without AMG biographies, although they almost always have at least a listing. I generally find that the vast majority of artists with AMG bios will at least pass WP:MUSIC point 1 if one does enough digging; this is especially so for artists popular before the 1990s. But it's true that AMG sometimes puts up bios of bands that haven't even released their debut album yet, if they're on a well-known label. Chubbles (talk) 18:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ooh, you hit on one of their weak spots there. AMG's coverage of early '90s hip-hop and R&B is bad, and there aren't a lot of good in-depth discographies of that stuff yet like there are for, say, indie rock and metal. Chubbles (talk) 19:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you very much! ISD (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi HisSpaceResearch, I see that you've been very active in Wikipedia, and have been involved in AfD discussions on bio pages where notability was an issue (e.g. Mark Prindle). To give such articles a home, and indeed to provide a wiki-style presence for anyone who wants it, I've created a website called Wikipopuli. Perhaps you would consider using it as a transwiki resource during future discussions (or indeed as a place for any bios you'd like to create that might fall afoul of WP:BIO)? In fact, given your level of experience in the wiki world, I'd be grateful for any feedback you care to give on the site. Thanks TheYellowCabin (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Youth Offending Team Glossary
Hi, You placed a delete notice on my article.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Youth_Offending_Team/Glossary Please recheck to confirm that it is NOT a dictionary.--SJB (talk) 09:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Your opinion
Hello, I would like to have your opinion on []. In your AFD post #, you had proposed to keep the article. The controversy was all about the reliability one minor source out of about 12 and despite the fact that I posted the 2 links showing that the main source is accdredited by the British Library, and that there are only 5 poetry website' endorsed by the British Library, the article was deleted with a genereal comment on stating that the sources are not reliable. Shouldn't wikipedia stick to its policies? If a source is endorsed by the British Library, isn't that enough to prove its reliability? I've also added other publications (paper) in the meantime, but that was not the point.

The real reason seems to me that 2 or 3 experienced wikipedians have ganged up against the article, but no one has commented on the reliability of the great majority of my sources, including the main one. Thanks. TonyBrit (talk) 14:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

AIDS importance
Per the AIDS and AIDS II articles, the AIDS family was the first known family of viruses to use the corresponding file technique to propagate infection. This is worthy of notice. It appears as though you are in a position to remove the importance tag from AIDS. I hope you find this acceptable. A-Day (c) (t) 05:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not removing the tag just yet. It does not state crucial information for an encyclopedia article, such as when it was first discovered, how many systems it affected, who possibly programmed it, etcetera.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Now there are links to source code, the author is noted, and an estimated data of authorship is provided. There's a link to a YouTube video too. Ready to remove your notability template? A-Day (c) (t) 04:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * X-D awesome A-Day (c) (t) 03:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Michael Forbes (farmer)
I have nominated Michael Forbes (farmer), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Michael Forbes (farmer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Adnan Ghalib
It's quite possible I did this wrong so please let me know if I screwed up and feel free to make any changes. I don't really think it will be a controversial subject if this article is deleted or if anyone will really object so I wasn't sure what template to use. Pinkadelica (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Marika Michalowska
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marika Michalowska, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Marika Michalowska. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Marika Michalowska
Well, a google search shows 31 ghits. And many of them are reliable source. So I see no reason that the article is non-notable, especially the fact User:DGG pointed "second best DJ in Poland".  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Marika Michalowska
An article that you have been involved in editing, Marika Michalowska, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Marika Michalowska. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I added comments here. Bearian (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of massacres (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/List of massacres (2nd nomination) reasons now given please reconsider your opinion. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Amy Winehouse
As a regular contributor to the Amy Winehouse article, you are invited to join the editing process of the article's personal life and controversy sections, temporarily located here. For discussion on recent issues, go here. For current discussions, go here.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Family (band)
I have nominated family (band) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 22:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The "Shoop" redirect to Cell

 * It sounds like the redirect was a reference to the "Lazer Collection" YouTube video which shows various characters, including Cell, shooting lasers out of their mouths (Cell shouts "Shoop da woop Imma firin mah lazor"). JuJube (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rate Your Students
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rate Your Students, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Rate Your Students. Thank you. W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Can-Tago Mago (album cover).jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Tago Mago (album cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Traffic (band) symbol.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Traffic (band) symbol.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Rachel Aldana
I thought you might like to know I've nominated this article you created for deletion (Articles for deletion/Rachel Aldana). I think there are issues relating to the subject's notability and the verifiability of the information within the article - especially since it's about a living person. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 04:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

New policy proposal that may be of interest
I'm tapping this message out to you because you were involved at the AfDs of Eve Carson or Lauren Burk. Following both of these heated debates, a new proposal has been made for a guideline to aid these contentious debates, which can be found at WP:N/CA. There is a page for comments at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions should you wish to make a comment. Thanks for your time, and apologies if this was not of interest! Fritzpoll (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song). - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song)
A tag has been placed on Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Taroaldo (talk) 15:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Heartbeat (Scouting for Girls song). Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chris Walter
I have nominated Chris Walter, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chris Walter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 01:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Britannica
You can see what subjects Britannica covers here, but you can only read a few lines of each article without paying. For instance, there are four mentions of Pokémon, but no article. The Simpsons gets its own article. It is quite interesting- as you would expect, we cover pop culture far, far better, and I remember reading somewhere they have no article that we don't. Don't quote me on that though, I may be wrong. J Milburn (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Re: your question about Britannica and other encyclopedias listing deaths by year: yes, they do it, but in the Year Books. There's an online version here for Deaths in 2003. --Canley (talk) 23:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)