User talk:Hisabness

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ken Buck has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \btwitter\.com\b (links: http://twitter.com/buckforcolorado). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ken Buck(disambiguation)


The article Ken Buck(disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Pointless dab page for one article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abi Fadeyi
A tag has been placed on Abi Fadeyi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abinomics
A tag has been placed on Abinomics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 02:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pendulum Capital Partners
A tag has been placed on Pendulum Capital Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 03:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hang On
-Pendulum Capital Partners is one of only a handful of private investment firms domiciled in Colorado. This has implications for the future of private investment firms given the current and potential future regulatory environment. -Other PE firms like KKR are allowed pages despite the fact that as a private company they are not required to report financials or confirm anything that is written about their company. -This firm can be reviewed on the Colorado business database for accuracy, etc. -EIN and tax documents can prove the firm purchased a company in 2010, again, one a few relative to previous/more booming years in finance. -Meta tags on the firms website confirm that its stated goal of reestablishing trust between capital owners and managers of capital. This again holds implications for the private investment world where the events of 2008 and 2009 lead millions of investors to stop investing and reevaluate previously accepted norms.

Speedy deletion nomination of Abinomics
A tag has been placed on Abinomics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hang On
-Website has significant page views -Is a financial glossary and resource for finance and econ information -Was acquired by pendulum capital partners in 2010 -Financial glossary is 1/8 the reported size of investopedia.com -This speedy delete does not apply to works, it applies to individuals and animals themselves -The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source.

April 2010
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. After this article was deleted you have re-created it without addressing the reason why it was deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hang On
-The site doesnt fall under the speed deletion criterion for the reasons listed above. Please see section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion

Your articles
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory or a vehicle for any kind of promotion. It does not expect to have articles about every company (though Wikicompany does).

Articles have to be of enough general interest for an encyclopedia article: the Wikipedia term for that is Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have other people, independent of the subject, thought it significant enough to write about? More detail in Notability (organizations and companies). KKR passes that test easily.

Also, articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and so people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own organizations, because of the conflict of interest involved. For more advice, read the FAQ/Organizations, in particular the sections headed: Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why doesn't Wikipedia have an article on my organization?
 * I think my organization deserves an article on Wikipedia but none exists. What can I do?

Last warning
Please stop adding promotional material for your site. It does not appear to be a reliable source, and you appear to have a conflict of interest. Since this seems to be an ongoing problem, please consider this a final warning. Kuru  (talk)  23:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

how do i prove i'm a reliable source? what credentials can i show?

glossary started by -ex deutsche bank banker -ivy league educated -what else do you need, money? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hisabness (talk • contribs) 21:37, 4 May 2010


 * I strongly recommend reading the Wikipedia guideline on reliable sources to see what sources are regarded as reliable. An individual Wikipedia editor's say so is certainly not acceptable as a reliable source, for several reasons, including (1) anyone can edit Wikipedia and claim to be anyone, so their word is not reliable, and (2) unfortunately many people come to Wikipedia for the purpose of promoting their own point of view, or to promote something else (eg a business or club), and so we need evidence that the views indicated genuinely have some currency in respected sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Ken Buck
I have nominated Ken Buck, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ken Buck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for promotion, as you did to United States Senate election in Colorado, 2010, you may be blocked from editing. A recent edit you made to this article served no visible purpose other than to move a candidate out of alphabetical order in a list and place him at the head of the list. Since you have a history of extensive editing in relation to this candidate in a way which looks highly promotional, it looks as though the purpose of this edit was also promotional. You have been warned more than once that using Wikipedia for promotional purposes is not acceptable: please do not continue to do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Ridiculous
The alphabetical order was an accident. I was correcting a mispelling. Quit bullying me.

Blanking
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Jane E. Norton, you may be blocked from editing. - TexasAndroid (talk) 01:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Ken Buck photo
The photo you added to the Ken Buck article is under discussion for being deleted. I thought you'd want to know, and I don't see any automatic noticed here so I don't think you do. Might have something to do with the article being deleted earlier. Flatterworld (talk)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LK (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)