User talk:Histiryian4all

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Histiryian4all for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.  Ogress  smash!  20:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
You have repeatedly been warned to stop your vandalism of articles on Wikipedia when you came here using other IPs. Please stop. You are welcome to contribute real edits to Wikipedia but all vandalism done by you will be reverted and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. You are welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a free user account of your own. It is clear you are User:2bvbesti3...  Ogress  smash!  20:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain why you have used two accounts in this manner, and not declared them? My talk page or the case page under "comments by accused parties" will be fine. Thank you. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. Please stick to this account only in future, or fully declare the other account as your own (see WP:SOCK). Otherwise you will be blocked for continued sockpuppetry. Thanks. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 09:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Histiryian4all for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.  Ogress  smash!  18:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''You continue to add uncited and highly questionable POV material to articles. Please read Wikipedia's guidelines.  Ogress  smash! '' 02:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wahhabi sack of Karbala


A tag has been placed on Wahhabi sack of Karbala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Summichum (talk) 19:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)