User talk:HistofSciJnlFollower

Welcome!
Hello, HistofSciJnlFollower, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Biological pest contrl. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

One small thing - I notice you are trying to use superscripted numbers to indicate references. The article - like most others - uses a system of "blue links" using tags. If you look at the structure of other "references" in the article, you will see that they generally use an additional system with cite tags, containing fields for author, title, date, and so on. I'm well aware this is a bit of a mouthful when you're getting started, but it would be really appreciated if you could at least convert your superscripts to ref tags - one good reason is, if anyone adds anything before one of your numbers, all the numbering will go wrong!

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at History of evolutionary thought, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on History of evolutionary thought. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at History of evolutionary thought. Theroadislong (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Blocked 72 hours for repeatedly adding unsourced content
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Please show where your source backs "The Lamarckian evolutionary ideas were very in influential in some non-Western countries"
Your source is about China. Please quote the text from your source that backs your repeated addition of "non-Western countries". Doug Weller talk 10:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes. Please see how to cite your sources, I've done one for you above. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)