User talk:Historian Blek

Dec 2018
Hello, I'm Anonymuss User. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Assassination of Julius Caesar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

Your draft article, Draft:Titiedius Servilius Casca


Hello, Historian Blek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Titiedius Servilius Casca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 06:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gaius Servilius Casca


The article Gaius Servilius Casca has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Mostly unverifiable original research, with a correct but irrelevant statement here and there to lend a shred of legitimacy. An assassin existed, but that's it. The title is wrong, the given name in the title is a confusion with that of another person (see Servilia gens, footnotes). Article was originally a draft which misrepresented two sources (now removed) and went by yet another bogus personal name ('Titiedius'), but nevertheless was inexplicably accepted in its article creation submission."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 00:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaius Servilius Casca for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaius Servilius Casca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gaius Servilius Casca until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Avilich (talk) 17:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)