User talk:Historian born 1975

removal of referenced content on Farhad Darya
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

another warning
According to the Biographical Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East and North Africa, he is half Tajik. Don't remove referenced information. That is considered vandalism.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

I repeat: removing sourced information is vandalism
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Padmanii (talk) 17:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit wars
Edit wars are discouraged. Try an article RFC if Padmanii won't discuss the issues on the appropriate talk page. By-the-by, at least one editor thought that Padmanii was a sockpuppet of the banned user Beh-nam. If Padmanii becomes abusive, try Wikiquette alerts as a first step rather than aping Padmanii's tactics. Civil, polite reasoned debate with rigorous citation to appropriate reliable authority is most effective. --Bejnar (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Be aware of the Three revert rule official Wikipedia policy which prohibits three full or partial reversions of the same article within 24-hours. This warning is also being given to Padmanii. --Bejnar (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Afghan.
I know you're passionate about the subject... But be neutral.. On the project page you are almost racist.. Using word's like 'those Shia' isn't a good way to prove your credibility, it makes you look racist, which I don't believe is your intention. RegardsMikeonatrike (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

3RR block

 * [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been blocked from editing for  in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below.  The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question. Nishkid64 (talk) 05:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Althought I disagree for being blocked, but nothing I can say, as for you admins have not done so much to block anti-Afghans and those who by means of their religion, and historical means makeup of almost every little thing. such as Afghanistani, and yet every Afghan topic has been harmed, and carrying no truth and if any sources are accepted they "MUST" be Iranian or anti-afghan. Anyways I would further look out not to delete sources as far i have prove of good source against it. Also I have no idea why my source taken from Toronto online library source was deleted from the Tajikistan? Historian born 1975 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

BTW I don't know Who is this NisarKand, for whom i have never been related to and nor live anywhere close to him, so how can i be banned for being NisarKand or his "sock puppet"?

AfD nomination of Hamid Golestani
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hamid Golestani. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Hamid Golestani. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Historian born 1975! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Zohreh Jooya -

Proposed deletion of Arash Howaida


The article Arash Howaida has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, as required by WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Arash Howaida for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arash Howaida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arash Howaida until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Muhandes (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)