User talk:HistoricalAgency

July 2018
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Treason— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 03:13, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Treason
Is the addition of facts, truth, and an accurate account of history by adding Donald Trump''s name to "see also" under the history and meaning of Treason accurate? Was calling Benedict Arnold a traitor "constructive" or just accurate? Is calling Putin a dictator constructive or accurate? Is colluding with Russia, siding with Russia over our Intel agencies, including our military Intel, and blaming the U.S. on foreign soil with an enemy state's leader, a former KGB agent who at the same press conference admitted to helping Trump in the election, constructive or accurate and does that not rise to the level of the definition of treason??? HistoricalAgency (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC)