User talk:History1221

Blocked as a sockpuppet
Hello - I hope I am doing it right. I do not have a lot of experience with Wikipedia. So, how can I prove that I am not connected at all to historylover4? I am blamed for something but I do no tknow how to prove the opposote. Please give me your advise. ON the other hand - what proof was provided that I AM connected to historylover4?? This should be more important to see this proof! Thanks, history1221.

History1221, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Ryan Vesey, Thanks for the invitaiton to the Teahouse. Unfortunately, though I tried, I do not know how to introduce myself there. When I click on "Introduce yourself" it just goes to messages that I got, and I do not know how to introduce my self. Also, can you please let me know why you invited me to the teahouseme? Is it because I was blocked as sockpuppet (eventhough no proof was given to this - just saying I might be using another account)? Thanks, History1221


 * So, let me get this straight. First, you had no connection with the Historylover4 account at all. Now, it seems it might have been your account "several years ago" but you forgot. Well, the Historylover4 account last edited in August 2012, not several years ago. What's your next story? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Beeblebrox, well, what can I say (about declining my request to be unblocked)? Can you please inform me how can I find out what did historylover4 edit in the past? I eidted only regarding my research topic (collective memory, mostly of the 1948 Palestinian exodus) and gave references only of my own academic articles. I am sure historylover4 edited - at least inter alia - other topics and never cited my articles. This will provide strong support that historylover4 and history1221 are different prople. Would you consider such an evidence as a valid one for my request to be unblocked? And if I will have such a proof, can I submit it here again as another request to be unblocked (but this time based on new evidence and arguements), and like this I will not have to go through a new unknown process via some committee? Thanks, history1221

Unblock requests
One unblock request is sufficient. Please remove one or remove both and add your preferred version.  Tide  rolls  02:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Note from blocking admin

 * Had to do some homework. The block was based on this SPI report, which I had initially endorsed for CU, but it was so obvious that I felt a CU would have thrown it back at me, so I duck blocked for six months, which is the period that the AE case was leaning toward.  This editor started editing at the exact same time that Historylover4 was getting blocked.  This editor's first edit was 02:00, 19 August 2012.  Historylover4 was blocked first by me, but was later reblocked via the Arb case by Blade at 23:57, 19 August 2012, so the writing was on the wall at that point and the duckiness of the case is obvious.  Feel free to look at contrib areas as well.  Since Historylover* is indef blocked via an Arb action, and the 1st year is covered under Arb enforcement guidelines, I don't recommend unblocking without going through Arb unless you think I was mistaken in the duck call, and that this is entirely a different person.  If you do, that is fine, I will leave it in your good hands, with no hard feelings.  My opinion should be obvious, so I won't labor it. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 20:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * That being the case I would again advise you to appeal to the ban appeals subcommittee. As this is related to an arbitration matter they should really be the ones to review it, but I will leave the above request open should some other admin wish to review it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Unblocked by Ban Appeals Subcommittee, restricted to one account
The Ban Appeals Subcommittee has considered your appeal, and decided to unblock you under the terms of Wikipedia's standard offer. You are unblocked on condition that you edit from this account (User:History1221) only; if you deliberately edit anonymously, or edit from any other account, without permission from the Wikipedia community or this subcommittee, you may be summarily and indefinitely reblocked by any uninvolved administrator. For the Ban Appeals Subcommittee, AGK  [•] 11:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Autobiographical memory because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)