User talk:History21st

Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Abd al-Mu'min. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 23:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Abd al-Mu'min, you may be blocked from editing. Aṭlas (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Last warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Expedition to Mostaganem (1558). M.Bitton (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

M.Bitton... you cannot do whatever you want in WP --History21st (talk) 00:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. M.Bitton (talk) 00:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nur ad-Din al-Bitruji, you may be blocked from editing. Wikaviani (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * you said you wanted to report me, I told you to do so. --History21st (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Wikaviani (talk) 17:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * finally you did it. "you have to let us do whatever we want or we report you." --History21st (talk) 17:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)--

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Number  5  7  19:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I am would be willing to unblock if you agreed to 0RR (no reverts on any article for any reason, even if you are right) for the next week and if has no objection to it. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't mind about that. I also think it would be better for the encyclopedia that the rules be applied on all members regardless of their seniority, because the moderators should not tolerate that a member edits info that has not been changed since 3 years, (in this article for example), starts an edit war and then complains to the moderators to get another member blocked. an article should not be edited until a consensus is found in the talk page.--History21st (talk) 04:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If is fine with these unblock conditions, I will unblock. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem. However, another revert will result in an immediate reblock. Number   5  7  10:37, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Having said that, someone has created the new account to continue making the same edits as History21st, so I'd like to see a clear WP:SPI report before an unblock happens. Perhaps Bbb23 could confirm if the two accounts are related?  Number   5  7  11:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yep. They’re on 0RR on every page on Wikipedia, so a revert equals a reblock. Unblocking now. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  17:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)


 * This is 4RR on one article, and this is returning to edit-war on the article you were previously blocked for edit-warring on, and accepted a 0RR restriction to be unblocked. Black Kite (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * On the first one no consensus was found why was the article edited? what should you do in a situation like that? ask administrators to intervene(like I did in the second) which they never do? I don't really get it. On the second I've said that they only participated in the discussions(which was initiated since 10 days) after I edited, no 3RR breaking there, and sometimes I feel you have to edit to bring them to participate in the discussions.--History21st (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * How come "Wikaviani" is not sanctionned for breaking 3RR in this article(link)? there is an involvment of Morocco, as Morocco and Spain were allies at that time against the Ottoman empire. --History21st (talk) 18:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Because they didn't. 3RR means more than 3 reverts. Black Kite (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok. --History21st (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I've been here before. If no one objects, I'd unblock you tomorrow on the condition that you only talk. Any article edits and you are blocked again. If anyone can see their way clear to unblocking sooner, great. I guess the TBAN would be appealable in 1 month @ WP:AN. Any other admin can reblock w/o discussion or drama until then. Ping me tomorrow if no one unblocks sooner.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 17:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * , stop being childish. you deleted my comment in your talk page, don't see why i should leave yours here. plus I think admins are better suited than you to give their advice here.
 * you also say it's a waste of time to discuss, why are you discussing then? don't do it. I feel like you're trying to help (M.Bitton) by all means. you even left a comment in his talk page to receive a "thank you" from him. your plan is to attack an article in group so you force edits without breaking the 3RR rule.
 * you're not interested in the subjects, which are related to Moroccan history, your only interest is to intervene wherever M.Bitton goes. that's trolling for me.
 * I've posted nearly 10 sources, they can't all be unreliable, this is ridiculous. --History21st (talk) 21:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * No objection from me (as a passing admin). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will also add that not posting to 's talk page is probably a good idea. ANd I would ask them not to post on your talk page. I remind both to discuss content and sourcing, not say mean things, keep it civil and all that. Seek broader consensus before making changes and seek dispute resolution. I remind History21 to only edit talk pages for the first month.

Seeking input from all the other admins who have blocked or declined or discussed. . (Gad. I had not known there had been so many.)-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * No objection to an unblock with that condition. 331dot (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the situation that led to this particular block. My unblock was my standard offer for most first time edit warring blocks, and I haven't kept track of this user since. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The proximate cause for the disruptive editing block was presumably preventing the edit warring; the proposed condition would alleviate the concern for now I suppose, at least in mainspace. Non-sequiturs like "I've posted nearly 10 sources, they can't all be unreliable" give me great concern that we will be back here soon enough. Kuru   (talk)  12:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Also have no objections as long as they stick to talk. Cheers, Number   5  7  16:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)