User talk:History6011

Proposed deletion of The Grove Community History Library


The article The Grove Community History Library has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Should be merged with Peppermint Grove, Western Australia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. smileguy91 Need to talk? 02:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Grove Community History Library has been reverted. Your edit here to The Grove Community History Library was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD6B2S_RAG3wbJaxmU6I32Q) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page The Grove Community History Library, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to The Grove Community History Library was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/GroveHistory) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

wow
what a way to start - you have been truly templated in your first day of editing. Please note there is a very freindly and helpful group of local editors you may have not yet met at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Western_Australia there is a varying range of editors with a wide range of experience here - some over 10 years...

please feel free to contact or use that page to make queries - or comments or feedback as well satusuro 09:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, History6011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! satusuro 09:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Problem
With going to universal points of contact, it is possible to get skewiff with things. One - not every school in perth is WP:N nor is every library, nor is every scout group, for instance. The best way to evaluate whether your local library is even notable - is where to go - to say you want to publicise your library is WP:NOT not what WP:ABOUT....

Very much worth speaking/linking with local editors. satusuro 09:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you - I think what you are saying is that our library is not WP:N. I just thought that the more places and subjects which are written about, the better the database of information. There are other libraries on WP so I thought our little library was valid. We have won a few awards for our digital stuff but always fail to get noticed by the public as we are always hidden under the main library name. I guess the main library would have no problem establishing a page and we would have to sit under their banner-AGAIN. Thank you for your input. History6011 (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

It depends, a long term editor might find enough WP:RS to qualify a local library for an entry - this is not a database of info - it is an online encyclopledia - pity you havent been adequately shown the difference between the two. If you are in the library and contactable - perhaps a local wikipedian can walk you through the issues and the best way to look at the issues that arise. satusuro 00:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

closer
It is really better to let an editor other than yourself to remove tags - specially if you created the article. The notion of review and appraisal apart from the creator is not spelt out very well for such issues - as to whether the issues are resolved depends from what perspective. satusuro 01:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)