User talk:Historydgl

Speedy deletion nomination of Warren Hamilton Laughlin
A tag has been placed on Warren Hamilton Laughlin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Declined
I have reviewed the article Warren Hamilton Laughlin and declined to speedy delete it. However, there are no sources listed in the article and I couldn't find any with a quick google search. Unless you (or another editor) can find and add sources in the next week, the article should be deleted via the proposed deletion process. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)