User talk:Historymaj18

April 2019
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Greg Finley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please spell "Edelman" correctly. Thank you 331dot (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, George W. Bush, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 05:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Rashod Berry moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rashod Berry, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  12:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Julian Edelman, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Will Hastings, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * "with a $57,500 in bones and if is keepted with the team for all three years" is not English. This is a professional encyclopedia, so please make sure spelling and grammar are correct before saving changes.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve D'Angelo Ross
Hello, Historymaj18,

Thank you for creating D'Angelo Ross.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Not seeing WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:GNG here."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Malik Gant for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik Gant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malik Gant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C)  16:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Malik Gant. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 11:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I mistakenly did that and did't know how to fix it, I was not trying to get in the way of the prosees i'm sorry for my error.

Your draft article, Draft:Kyle Searles


Hello, Historymaj18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kyle Searles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Thuney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IR. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I noticed that you made a change to an article, New England Patriots Cheerleaders, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Andrew, I did't see the need to souce that becouse both Camille Kostek and Rob Gronkowski pages already do that so anyone could easy click on them and see it, but I see your point.

Kristian Wilkerson moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kristian Wilkerson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Eagles 24/7 (C)  17:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashod Berry has been accepted
 Rashod Berry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Rashod_Berry help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Eagles 24/7 (C)  00:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Barrington, Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Law and Order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gillette Stadium; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 213.205.192.172 (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Thank you, it the "war" was with me so it is funny but thank you anyway.

That was with myself 😂 Historymaj18 (talk) 03:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnny Carson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Shapiro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1987 Bullingdon Club photograph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)