User talk:Histrionical

Thank you for creating an article on Daniel Gerroll; however, we already had an article on him. Furthermore, the article you created was full of information that is not really encyclopedic. Consequently, the article has been deleted.

Just the same, thank you for trying; you are welcome to try again. DS 12:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

July 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dian Wei, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Клоун   00:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk  00:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk  00:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.  Клоун   00:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gordon Hammersley


The article Gordon Hammersley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references from independent reliable sources with significant mentions of this person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- 1Wiki8 Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

I don’t understand the reason for the deletion Histrionical (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)