User talk:Hixteilchen

June 2009
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.  TJ   Spyke   22:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Changing of wwe.com urls
Please stop changing instance of www.wwe.com to us.wwe.com. You are not "correcting" the link, you are simply changing ot to a redirect. For example, in this edit, you changed http://www.wwe.com/shows/ecw/superstars/paulburchill/ to http://us.wwe.com/shows/ecw/superstars/paulburchill. When you actually click on the link http://us.wwe.com/shows/ecw/superstars/paulburchill/ it redirects to http://www.wwe.com/shows/ecw/superstars/paulburchill/, and it is http://www.wwe.com/shows/ecw/superstars/paulburchill/ that shows up in the url bar at the top of the page. Your edits are not helping or correcting anything, and other users agree at WT:PW. Please stop changing them. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
When Gail Kim held the title it was called the "TNA Women's World Championship", so references to the title in her article should say that.  TJ   Spyke   19:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
WWE introduce Eve to the ring as "Eve Torres". Do not revert this. Thank you. ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 01:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Michael Cole called her "Eve Torres" on Superstars this week. At least I think it was Cole. It was certainly one of them.  !! Just a Punk !!  12:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh and next time you comment on my page, go to the bottom of the page - not the top. Thank you.  !! Just a Punk !!  12:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

It is not important what Lawler, Cole or ring announcers say! WWE.com is important! Look on your talk page! => PWND!!!
 * Yes it is. It's crucial. Show content is more notable than the website. Due to the contradiction a secondary source now is required independent of WWE.com. And please review WP:CIVIL before commenting again. Thank you.  !! Just a Punk !!  08:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 19:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment
Hi, I reverted your edits at List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment as they weren't referenced. Please provide a valid reference for your edits. MC Rocks 05:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees
--  Θaks  ter   20:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees
Hey, i've talk to Oakster about MVP, and he sent me this: "Actually, I'd have to agree with you Mike in both cases. Hixteilchen's video source actually features Savannah announcing him as "Montel Vontavious Porter, MVP", so the name is still in use. And according to MVP's inmate records, Burke is his name listed while Assad is only listed as an alias." So I was right.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 20:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Look, that's his full ring name. If you don't like it, e-mail Vince McMahon.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

That's not his full ring name. His ring name is MVP => http://www.wwe.com/superstars/smackdown/mvp/ In the entrance in the Video there is simply M.V.P.! If you don't like it, e-mail WWE.com. --Hixteilchen (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

My talk page
Please post to my talk page not to my talk page archives.-- Steam Iron  03:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Steam Iron  04:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Steam Iron  04:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Steam Iron  04:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

MVP
Stop trolling all you do is yell yell yell now MVP is his nickname and Montel Vontavious Porter is his real ring name MVP is for short.--Curtis23's Usalions 17:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop reverting his ring name is Montel Vontavious Porter Curtis23's Usalions 22:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

MVP's name
please start a dessication over MVP's name this is getting out of hand if it continues I will have the page locked from any one being able to edit the page. Do no further action leave the name as is till consensus has been met.-- Steam Iron  23:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for List of current champions in TNA Wrestling
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 06:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Florida Championship Wrestling
Dear Hixteilchen, User: 187.15.32.66 has changed your edit on Florida Championship Wrestling.--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Syrthiss (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rachel Roxxx


The article Rachel Roxxx has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 21:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rachel Roxxx


The article Rachel Roxxx has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Tabercil (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rachel Roxxx


The article Rachel Roxxx has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can meet the GNG or any other specialized guideline; wretched to nonexistent sourcing, generally promotional. Old AFD resulted in delete, update not sufficiently identical to speedy

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachel Roxx


A tag has been placed on Rachel Roxx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 23:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Rachel Roxx, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --  role player 23:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Rachel Roxx for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Rachel Roxx, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rachel Roxx until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> ttonyb (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Epbr123
You should consider hooking up with User:Epbr123 to work on articles. See User:Epbr123/Notes and User:Epbr123/Adult award winners and nominees. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 16:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I will do. --Hixteilchen (talk) 18:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Andy San Dimas. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Krissy Lynn


A tag has been placed on Krissy Lynn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. <span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> ttonyb (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Removal of DRV discussion
It is not appropriate, apart from one's own talk page, to remove/blank discussions in which other users have participated. If you wish to withdraw a DRV request, insert a statement to that effect and, if appropriate, mark the matter resolved. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK --Hixteilchen (talk) 03:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Jerry Lawler
Here's the deal with Lawler...

When he wrestles once every 3 months, and isn't involved in any major feuds, then he goes in the ocassional file.

When he wrestles 5 times in 8 weeks, does run-ins, and is feuding with the WWE Champion, he goes on the main roster because he's now a major player on the show, not just a background guy.

Thank you.

Vjmlhds 15:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

All I'm doing is adjusting the roster to reflect the current situatuion on Raw.

Lawler has been wrestling a bunch and is involved in a featured feud with the WWE Champion.

The article you keep pointing out backs me up, as Miz made a point of going after Lawler, showing the feud still goes on.

Vjmlhds 02:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Savannah Gold


A tag has been placed on Savannah Gold, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  14:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Natalie Heck
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hang on underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

March 1, 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of shopping malls in the Philippines. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Damirgraffiti (talk) 05:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

AJ's complete real name
Her complete real name is April Jeanette Mendez. I provided a source in the article. The source is still there. And Genickbruch is not so reliable. There are wrong real names in some wrestlers profiles there. IMDB confirms her complete real name as April Jeanette Mendez: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4054498/ Her fan clubs too. And if you want I have her real facebook account. There her name is April Jeanette Mendez. I can provide it to you if you want. WWEJobber (talk) 07:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It is ok. You are welcome. WWEJobber (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Election issues in Germany
I'm having trouble finding political issues for the state elections in Germany. Where could I find some and would you be able to look them up too? Kingjeff (talk) 04:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

If you are into statistics, go on http://wahlarchiv.tagesschau.de/wahlarchiv/archiv/landtag.shtml http://www.n-tv.de/politik/ http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/ --Hixteilchen (talk) 04:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm interested in more than the polls and final election tallies. I would also like to include the election issues. Kingjeff (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC) I haven't found a site yet. I'm more into statistics. Most of the German media doesn't write about the political issues. They are into statistics, too. Or they just describe who the politicians are like on http://www.phoenix.de/content//365852 --Hixteilchen (talk) 04:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi
There is no "correct"link. Redirects can be used too. Read WP:NOTBROKEN, it exaplains it. There is no reason to change to the target page, all the redirects work too. Its an unhelpful exercise and serves no reason. Wrestling0101 (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Man, I have read the WPNOTBROKEN. It was wrong in the first place to take the names. I just wanna take the correct links. And there is a correct link even if you don't admit it! So let's just keep the CORRECT link! I will undo it evry time. Don't you have other problems than to undo correct wiki links? --Hixteilchen (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

When they were put there as new champions the Paul Wight and Glen Jacobs links were there, so there is no reason to change it per WP:NOTBROKEN. That page says there isnt a correct link that needs to be added, the redirects are there for a reason and can be used, dont u have other problems to worry about? Wrestling0101 (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I will undo it every time. I don't accept your argument. I have done this a 1000 times to use the correct wiki links and NEVER somebody wrote WPNOTBROKEN. I did it the last 2 years. You are the only one that uses WPNOTBROKEN in the wrestling portal! --Hixteilchen (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Bottom line: it doesn't matter who started it, or what the dispute actually is, edit warring is unacceptable behavior. And I've placed this notice at both user talk pages, so that I can tell you both to cut it out. oknazevad (talk) 03:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pietro Lombardi (singer)


The article Pietro Lombardi (singer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 Hours for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz reported by User:Hixteilchen (Result: )
OK, I searched for prizes/awards in the internet, all new prizes have reliable sources. User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz DELETED these awards without discussion. These Awards can be found also in other porn articles so the deletion is pure vandalism by a well-known exclusionist. Thanks. I started a discussion. --Hixteilchen (talk) 00:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

2012 in WWE Events
Hi there, I noticed you tried to vote on the deletion for 2012 in WWE events. However, you cast the vote in the wrong location! The discussion isn't taking place on the talk page, it's taking place here -- if you wish to vote, please do so there. Thanks! –  Richard  BB  12:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at No_Way_Out_(2012). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Don't abuse the the minor edit feature, please. Gorgak25 (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at SummerSlam (2012), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  JC  Talk to me My contributions 03:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at SummerSlam (2012). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer  Waters  03:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon:==( o ) 03:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Big Tits at School


The article Big Tits at School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails NFILM and the GNG. Just an unsourced, commentary-free collection of castlists. "Best Big Bust" whatever is not a major award for excellence in any aspect of filmmking, as required by the pertinent SNG.

Nomination of Big Tits at School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Tits at School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Big Tits at School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC) While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Big Tits at School listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big Tits at School. Since you had some involvement with the Big Tits at School redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Girlvana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girlvana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Girlvana& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Big Wet Asses for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Wet Asses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The following articles have also been nominated:
 * Slutty and Sluttier
 * Evil Anal

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Big Wet Asses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of current champions in Impact Wrestling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of current champions in Impact Wrestling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of current champions in Impact Wrestling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Vjmlhds (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)