User talk:Hizubiki25

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Hizubiki25. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I've fixed your request for proper display, though I was tempted not to since you are clearly insulting our intelligence. Someone else will review and likely decline this. 331dot (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Paid editing; action required
Hello Hizubiki25. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hizubiki25. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Hizubiki25; to date, you have made 65 edits to articles on Wikipedia that are still in existence. So let's work through those; That's 63 of your 65 edits to mainspace all having to do with Naver. The remaining two edits are minor copyedits. So, 96.9% of your edits to mainspace are all having to do with Naver and your claim is you have no affiliation with Naver? You've been here for over a year, and in that time virtually your entire focus has been on things Naver. You're expecting us to believe this is entirely random, and that in that year nothing else but the two minor edits you did in mainspace today has struck your interest? Above, 331dot noted "you are clearly insulting our intelligence". I find myself quite incredulous about your claims. Four administrators now have denied your unblock request. We have all essentially reached the same conclusion about the veracity of your comments. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 19 are to Studio N (company), a Naver property
 * 17 are to Line Webtoon, a Naver property
 * 13 are to Naver Corporation
 * 4 to Crunchyroll, a partner of Naver
 * 4 to Line Corporation, a Naver property
 * 3 to Webtoon to post information about Naver products
 * 2 to Yahoo! Japan about Naver
 * 1 to post information to SoftBank Group about Naver
 * 1 to Noblesse (manhwa), a Naver product

Concern regarding Draft:Naver matome (service)
Hello, Hizubiki25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naver matome (service), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Naver matome (service)


Hello, Hizubiki25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naver matome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)