User talk:Hjoshi1

June 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Salman Khan has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits.   -- DaxServer (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Salman Khan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   -- DaxServer (talk) 09:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Salman Khan, you may be blocked from editing.   -- DaxServer (talk) 09:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Darr, you may be blocked from editing. Politanvm talk 16:10, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Amrita Rao, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Suonii180 (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Gadar 2 in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. Your edit summary said typo, but your edit deleted the word "third", thus changing the meaning of the sentence. That was a misleading edit summary. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you want to discuss the issue, leave a message on Talk:Gadar 2. Thanks. -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gadar 2, without citing a reliable source. The old version was supported by the sources cited for it. You changed the text, and left your new version next to the sources given for the old version. This created the illusion that they supported your version. That is not OK. Please review the guidelines at Verifiability. If you are going to make changes, make sure you add references to the article that support your new version. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gadar 2. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.