User talk:Hkcbgcs

License tagging for Image:Wskf.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wskf.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 12:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kaigan1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kaigan1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 13:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wskf.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wskf.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sue Anne 01:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Otaku
"Rv" means revert, see Help:Reverting.

There were several issues with the text at the top. References should go in a references section at the bottom. They shouldn't be added above the introduction paragraph. Email addresses aren't appropriate (this is an encyclopedic article, it's supposed to be "timeless"). Bolding parts of sentenes to emphasize a point is almost never done, see the Manual of Style.

Things that are propogated by China BBS and forums anen't necessarily encyclopedic. very significant internet memes are sometimes allowed, but it's less encyclopedic than other parts of the Otaku article, and again, should not be inserted before the introductory paragraph of the article.

Information added to Wikipedia also needs to be widely accepted... if certain facts are only accepted by a small group of people, they shouldn't be added (see No original research). If there is a dispute over whether information is original research (as there seems to be), you'll be asked to cite reliable sources to back up the claims made.

Regarding your user page (User:Hkcbgcs)... we try to maintain a more professional atmosphere here, and it may be better if you don't have statements like you currently do on your main page. Racial discrimination isn't tolerated here, but I honestly don't see where Paul has made any discriminatory comments. Please assume good faith unless you have evidence to the contrary. If you have disputes with other editors, please discuss and try to resolve the disputes rather than increasing them.

Paul's "holy crap" statement might have been a bit uncivil, but I also think that the text needs a lot of work before it should be added back to the article. --Interiot 12:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)



Reply:

Yes...I agree so because some of the definitions of otakus bias each other, causing conflicts easily. So far it is better for me to follow what general public accepted as to the meaning of "otakus" in order not to make mess again. An better approach for me is to do more researches about it in the field of social science, and the relevent articles might have the external URL linked to wikipedia some day. Maybe "otakuism", like "green chemistry", is an appreciable coined terms in the tower of ivory, which summarizes what work otakus have done in current society. Anyway, thank you for your great help! :)--Hkcbgcs 23:55, 26 August 2006 (GMT +8:00)


 * Hi, you sent me a message and reverted my edits to the "Otaku" article. I am sorry to offend you, but your article is unreadable by native English speakers. Please edit versions of the article in the language(s) you can use fluently.. Are you using some kind of online translator? Even the paragraph you wrote in your answer above is not English. I would not attempt to edit, for example, the Chinese version of the article unless I could use Chinese to native level. Please extend the same courtesy to the English version. Your edits are not "hard to read", they are simply not English. For example these 2 lines>>>>>>>


 * Maybe "otakuism", like "green chemistry", is an appreciable coined terms in the tower of ivory, which summarizes what work otakus have done in current society.


 * That sentence is not English. It uses English *words*, but it is nonsense. All of your edits to the article were like that. I am not saying this to offend you, but as I said, your article is unreadable by *English speakers*. Please edit the article in your own language(s).

Re:User page reversion
You can request an Editor review where other editors can give you feedback on you - Editor review. --Sagaciousuk (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)



reply:

Oh I see. So that possibilities of edit conflicts can be reduced. --Hkcbgcs 00:21, 27 August 2006 (GMT +8:00)

Otaku
Hello Hkcbgcs. If you would not mind, please do not "top post" to talk page; kindly add your comments to the end. As for the Otaku article, the reason this was reverted was that there was no source immediately cited after the claim -- just something randomly placed in the external links section. Upon further review, I am not sure whether or not cabeat.com qualifies as a reliable source. Is this site a reputable news organization, a blog, a personal website, or something else? What would be most helpful for this sort of content would be one or more mainstream references, such as a magazine article or book related to the subject. If cabeat is in deed a reliable source then please accept my apologies. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Otaku
Hello Hkcbgcs. If you would not mind, please do not "top post" to talk page; kindly add your comments to the end. As for the Otaku article, the reason this was reverted was that there was no source immediately cited after the claim -- just something randomly placed in the external links section. Upon further review, I am not sure whether or not cabeat.com qualifies as a reliable source. Is this site a reputable news organization, a blog, a personal website, or something else? What would be most helpful for this sort of content would be one or more mainstream references, such as a magazine article or book related to the subject. If cabeat is in deed a reliable source then please accept my apologies. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

reply: okey. cabeat.com is build by the anime fans studying Japanese studies under the subsidy of The University of Hong Kong and Chinese University of Hong Kong, and the aim of the website is to provide objective exposition of phenomenons about ACG. So do you think the source is reliable enough? nexttime I will pay especiall attention on citing the source to reduce the chance of sudden RVs that scare me a lot. Anyway, I would like to declare that I would never treat simple blog entries as sources, except for celebrities (eg: the Chief Executive in HKSAR).

Hkcbgcs 17:38, 1 September 2006 (GMT +8:00)

otaku
I have no knowledge of anime/manga, aside from loving Spirited Away, but I will try to help with editing issues. You should try to use the tag for sources.

The disagreements about your page look... at least they appear to be done in good faith. I don't think people are vandalizing your page. I think people are disagreeing with you, but are acting in good faith while doing so. Ling.Nut 13:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

reply:

Simply their ignorance of Chinese Language incur many deletion (alleged by RV) of otaku page, even when refrence is made. So I will no longer contribute to the otak page to avoid waste of time. Instead, I will put the most importsnt deleted element "Otakuism" to the Asian Study Centre in The University of Hong Kong.

Image copyright problem with File:Cometo young.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cometo young.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cbgcs.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cbgcs.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Ks1.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ks1.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Sks ksi.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sks ksi.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Cometo old.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cometo old.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Locating kamakura.gif


The file File:Locating kamakura.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, sourced to which is dead so unclear if free license claim is legit."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Comet-san title.jpg


The file File:Comet-san title.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)