User talk:Hkendall93

June 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Really appreciate it. Hkendall93 (talk) 08:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Renamed. Note that using any random article as a model is not a good idea, as those articles could themselves be inappropriate, and you would be unaware of that. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those that are classified as good articles.

Since they won't edit about themselves, what do you think? 331dot (talk) 20:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the username change! And thanks for the guidelines on good articles, will be helpful. Hkendall93 (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @331dot: So long as "Hark" is actually just meant to represent them / their interests (their name was Hark media and the article mentions Hark records), I suppose I don't see a reason not to give them a second chance. I'd hate to miss out on potentially decent contributors, so you have my blessing. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah that’s right, HARK is like my joke corp name that I’ll be using to put my creative projects under…(just an amalgamation of my name, Harry K…Hark) sorry for the mishap. Hkendall93 (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)