User talk:Hl5250d

September 2012
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Bonn International School because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm sorry but the content isn't reliable as per policies relating to verifiability. This is 'not a Blog, or a reviews page, unfortunately, I will have to remove the content you added. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bonn International School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bonn International School was changed by Hl5250d (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931758 on 2012-09-09T13:04:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bonn International School, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Hl5250dn for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bonn International School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please do not blank pages like what you did. --'' Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Which we're also not going to do, because a) your brother retains access to your IP address, and according to you has a propensity for creating sockpuppets, and b) we have no way of telling whose hands were on the keyboard then, or even if you have a little brother. For all we know (and this is covered in the essay you didn't find funny) you're making him up and did all that yourself. Blocks are meant to prevent disruption to Wikipedia; lifting these would only enable it. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)