User talk:Hlaguerre/Discrimination based on skin color/Fstallone22 Peer Review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing? Hlaguerre Link to draft you're reviewing: Discrimination based on skin color Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes Lead evaluation Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content is relevant to the topic. Is the content added up-to-date? The content added is up to date. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The content does belong to the article and seems to be very thorough. Content evaluation Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? There are no bias sentences or opinions. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Nope. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the content soley explains what this topic truly means and where these ideologies came from, there are no bias responses or any content showing the editor feels one way or another. Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes. Are the sources current? Yes, their sources are from the past 5-7 years, the most current needed for so topic. Check a few links. Do they work? Sources and references evaluation Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes. Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes. Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes. Organization evaluation Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images, however, there could be images included to make the article more complete. Images and media evaluation For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info-boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? New Article Evaluation Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes. What are the strengths of the content added? No bias statements which makes the article neutral for all readers. How can the content added be improved? More information for the introduction could be included to make the introduction to the topic more convincing and understandable. Overall evaluation