User talk:Hlt123

Speedy deletion of Famous Smoke Shop
A tag has been placed on Famous Smoke Shop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Gtstricky Talk or C 21:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Rocky Patel Premium Cigars"
A page you created, Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Original famous smoke shop retail store.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Original famous smoke shop retail store.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
ukexpat (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Original famous smoke shop retail store.jpg
Would be happy to review the permission. Please remind me on my talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks like the licensing has been sorted out. I am going to nominate the article for a DYK spot on the main page. Will post a link to the nomination when done. – ukexpat (talk) 20:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination
I just nominated the article for a DYK spot: Template talk:Did you know. – ukexpat (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I'm honored :-) Hayward Tenney (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Editing Talk:Famous Smoke Shop
No worries, "G8" (Talk page deletion) is a cleanup procedure. The idea is that we delete the talk pages after the corresponding articles got deleted. I'm happy to see that the article wasn't deleted this time (it's much better too ^^). There's no issue with recreating the talk page since the article is back. Thank you for your persistence in writing it! -- Luk  talk 14:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Famous Smoke Shop

 * Congrats on the DYK! Ukexpat posting via BlackBerry.206.53.157.138 (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rocky Patel Premium Cigars for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocky Patel Premium Cigars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rocky Patel Premium Cigars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 15:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)