User talk:Hm2k/Archives/2011/August

Domain Registry of America
Why is is that your postings regarding Domain Registry of America are all negative? As a customer of theirs for over 11 years now I have had no problems with their services. I am sure after 11 years in business there must be something positive you can write about them? When I go to Microsoft's wiki page, there is plenty of positive feedback regarding them besides the billions of dollars in fines they have for breaching laws just like many other fortune 500 companies have done. Your postings are unconstructive and borderline on slanderous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.13.106.153 (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The article is about domain slamming, Domain Registry of America has a key role in that, everything written about Domain Registry of America is supported by reliable sources as per Wikipedia's editing policy. If you wish to discuss the content of an article further, you should use the talk page on that article. --Hm2k (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I received a request to restore the original article before the merge, and I do not see any sign of consensus for the merge, and am therefore planning to  revert  it. More important, redirecting the name of a company to a general article on disreputable practice is clearly inappropriate. If it were a person, it would be a blatant violation of BLP policy. Even companies are treated with fairness with respect to WP:IMDUE and WP:NPOV. Unless this were the primary thing the company was known  for, and also if they should have been the only significant company known for the practice, and if it were documented very reliably in the article, would it conceivably be correct. At least the second of these conditions is clearly not true, or at least not documented to be true. The redirect by itself is an attack page, for it does not given information, and can only serve to disparage the company. I deleted it as such and will delete any attempted re-creation of such a redirect. Further comment omn the content of the article is for  the article talk p.    DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I boldly merged the article. This "company" has no notability without the context of the subject it was redirected to. If the article is restored I will immediately propose it for deletion as it does not and will not meet notability guidelines. In no way is the redirect an attack page, in fact what it is is a redirect to the merged material, but whatever the case I support deletion of the Domain Registry of America article and any attempt to recreate it should be deleted. --Hm2k (talk) 09:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)