User talk:Hmbrew311

A tag has been placed on 7lightningbolt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 06:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to 7lightningbolt:
Your recent edit to 7lightningbolt (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 06:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Your argument:
 * There are so many times when I want to find out information about a new website, company or musical artist and WIKIPEDIA always has information about them. This, to me, is NOT advertising, it is nothing more than information about who people are and what they do (if it be music, art, film, fashion or community). Since we classify as a similar group as the aforementioned, I created a section for ourselves. I believe that I tried to mock up our page similar to the pages of other groups to specifically NOT make it blatant advertising. I am willing to rewrite it in order to be according to the guidelines, but I believe the article has a NPOV.


 * My reply:
 * The article reads like spam. It probably fails our notability guidelines anyway.  --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 09:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)